Thinking Tools: You can Prove a negative

Steven D. Hales

doi:10.1017/S1477175600001287

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Thinking Tools is a regular feature that introduces tips and pointers on thinking clearly and rigorously.

Crossref Citations

This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Dyer, Keith Holmes, Peter Roast, Stephen Taylor, Colin J.L. and Wither, Andrew 2017. Challenges in the management and regulation of large cooling water discharges. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 190, Issue. , p. 23.

Guida, Alessandro Carnet, Sophie Normandon, Marlène and Lavielle-Guida, Magali 2018. Can spatialisation be extended to episodic memory and open sets?. Memory, Vol. 26, Issue. 7, p. 922.

Tichý, Ondřej 2018. Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics. Vol. 82, Issue. , p. 81.

Guida, Alessandro Fartoukh, Michaël and Mathy, Fabien 2020. The development of working memory spatialization revealed by using the cave paradigm in a two‐alternative spatial choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1477, Issue. 1, p. 54.

Racki, Grzegorz and Lucas, Spencer G. 2020. Timing of dicynodont extinction in light of an unusual Late Triassic Polish fauna and Cuvier’s approach to extinction. Historical Biology, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 452.

Harrison, T. Mark and Lenardic, Adrian 2022. Burke’s Law: Toward a Reasoned Discussion of Deep Time. Elements, Vol. 18, Issue. 5, p. 354.

Turri, John 2022. A Peculiar and Perpetual Tendency: An Asymmetry in Knowledge Attributions for Affirmations and Negations. Erkenntnis, Vol. 87, Issue. 4, p. 1795.

Article contents

Thinking Tools: You can Prove a negative

Abstract

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests