Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:48:23.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bihemispheric representation, foveal splitting, and visual word recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1999

Richard Shillcock
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9LW Scotlandrcs@cogsci.ed.ac.ukpmon@cogsci.ed.ac.uk www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/rcs www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/pmon
Padraic Monaghan
Affiliation:
Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, EH8 9LW Scotlandrcs@cogsci.ed.ac.ukpmon@cogsci.ed.ac.uk www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/rcs www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/ccs/people/who/pmon

Abstract

Pulvermüller's account of lexical representation has implications for visual word recognition, given the claim we make that a foveally presented word is precisely split and contralaterally projected to the two hemispheres, and that this splitting conditions the whole process of visual word recognition. This elaboration of Pulvermüller's account raises issues of hemispheric differences and collaboration.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)