Open Peer Commentary Caplan & Waters: Working memory and sentence comprehension
A separate language-interpretation resource: Premature fractionation?
Paul Whitney a1andDesiree Budd a2 a1 Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820
pwhitney@mail.wsu.edu a2 Department of Psychology, Morehead State University, Morehead, KY 40351
d.budd@morehead-st.edu
Abstract
The target article argues for the modularity of language
interpretive processes without the usual criterion that a module
be informationally encapsulated. It is the encapsulation criterion,
however, that gives modularity most of its testability. Without the
criterion of encapsulation, testing whether relatively automatic
comprehension processes use their own unique resource is a very
tricky matter.