Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T14:13:58.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimal transient growth and very large–scale structures in turbulent boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2009

CARLO COSSU*
Affiliation:
LadHyX, CNRS-École Polytechnique, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
GREGORY PUJALS
Affiliation:
LadHyX, CNRS-École Polytechnique, F-91128 Palaiseau, France PSA Peugeot Citroën, Centre Technique de Velizy, 2 Route de Gisy, 78943 Vélizy-Villacoublay Cedex, France
SEBASTIEN DEPARDON
Affiliation:
PSA Peugeot Citroën, Centre Technique de Velizy, 2 Route de Gisy, 78943 Vélizy-Villacoublay Cedex, France
*
Email address for correspondence: Carlo.Cossu@ladhyx.polytechnique.fr

Abstract

The optimal energy growth of perturbations sustained by a zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary is computed using the eddy viscosity associated with the turbulent mean flow. It is found that even if all the considered turbulent mean profiles are linearly stable, they support transient energy growths. The most amplified perturbations are streamwise uniform and correspond to streamwise streaks originated by streamwise vortices. For sufficiently large Reynolds numbers two distinct peaks of the optimal growth exist, respectively scaling in inner and outer units. The optimal structures associated with the peak scaling in inner units correspond well with the most probable streaks and vortices observed in the buffer layer, and their moderate energy growth is independent of the Reynolds number. The energy growth associated with the peak scaling in outer units is larger than that of the inner peak and scales linearly with an effective turbulent Reynolds number formed with the maximum eddy viscosity and a modified Rotta–Clauser length based on the momentum thickness. The corresponding optimal perturbations consist of very large–scale structures with a spanwise wavelength of the order of 8δ. The associated optimal streaks scale in outer variables in the outer region and in wall units in the inner region of the boundary layer, in which they are proportional to the mean flow velocity. These outer streaks protrude far into the near wall region, having still 50% of their maximum amplitude at y+ = 20. The amplification of very large–scale structures appears to be a robust feature of the turbulent boundary layer: optimal perturbations with spanwise wavelengths ranging from 4δ to 15δ can all reach 80% of the overall optimal peak growth.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

del Álamo, J. C. & Jiménez, J. 2006 Linear energy amplification in turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 559, 205213.Google Scholar
del Álamo, J. C., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R. D. 2004 Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 135144.Google Scholar
Andersson, P., Berggren, M. & Henningson, D. 1999 Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 11 (1), 134150.Google Scholar
Bottaro, A., Souied, H. & Galletti, B. 2006 Formation of secondary vortices in a turbulent square-duct flow. AIAA J. 44, 803811.Google Scholar
Butler, K. M. & Farrell, B. F. 1992 Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys. Fluids A 4, 16371650.Google Scholar
Butler, K. M. & Farrell, B. F. 1993 Optimal perturbations and streak spacing in wall-bounded turbulent shear flow. Phys. Fluids 5, 774777.Google Scholar
Cess, R. D. 1958 A survey of the literature on heat transfer in turbulent tube flow. Res. Rep. 8–0529–R24. Westinghouse.Google Scholar
Corbett, P. & Bottaro, A. 2000 Optimal perturbations for boundary layers subject to streamwise pressure gradient. Phys. Fluids 12, 120130.Google Scholar
Cossu, C. & Brandt, L. 2002 Stabilization of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by finite amplitude optimal streaks in the Blasius boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 14, L57L60.Google Scholar
De Graaff, D. B. & Eaton, J. K. 2000 Reynolds-number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 319346.Google Scholar
Ellingsen, T. & Palm, E. 1975 Stability of linear flow. Phys. Fluids 18, 487.Google Scholar
Farrell, B. F. & Ioannou, P. J. 1993 Optimal excitation of three-dimensional perturbations in viscous constant shear flow. Phys. Fluids 5, 13901400.Google Scholar
Farrell, B. F. & Ioannou, P. J. 1996 Generalized stability theory. Part I: autonomous operators. Part II: nonautonomous operators. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 20252053.Google Scholar
Farrell, B. F. & Ioannou, P. J. 1998 Perturbation structure and spectra in turbulent channel flow. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 11, 237250.Google Scholar
Fransson, J., Brandt, L., Talamelli, A. & Cossu, C. 2004 Experimental and theoretical investigation of the non-modal growth of steady streaks in a flat plate boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 16, 36273638.Google Scholar
Fransson, J., Brandt, L., Talamelli, A. & Cossu, C. 2005 Experimental study of the stabilisation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by finite amplitude streaks. Phys. Fluids 17, 054110.Google Scholar
Fransson, J., Talamelli, A., Brandt, L. & Cossu, C. 2006 Delaying transition to turbulence by a passive mechanism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 064501.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, L. H. 1991 Energy growth of three-dimensional disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 241260.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. M., Kim, J. & Waleffe, F. 1995 Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures. J. Fluid Mech 287, 317348.Google Scholar
Hites, M. H. 1997 Scaling of high-Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers in the national diagnostic facility. PhD thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Hoyas, S. & Jiménez, J. 2006 Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to re τ = 2003. Phys. Fluids 18, 011702.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 128.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. 2007 Recent developments on wall-bounded turbulence. Rev. R. Acad. Cien. A 101, 187203.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J., del Álamo, J. C. & Flores, O. 2004 The large-scale dynamics of near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 505, 179199.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. & Moin, P. 1991 The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213240.Google Scholar
Kitoh, O. & Umeki, M. 2008 Experimental study on large-scale streak structure in the core region of turbulent plane Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 20, 025107.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741773.Google Scholar
Kovasznay, L. S. G., Kibens, V. & Blackwelder, R. F. 1970 Large-scale motion in the intermittent region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 283325.Google Scholar
Kreiss, G., Lundbladh, A. & Henningson, D. S. 1994 Bounds for threshold amplitudes in subcritical shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 270, 175198.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1980 A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 243.Google Scholar
Lauga, E. & Cossu, C. 2005 A note on the stability of slip channel flows. Phys. Fluids 17, 088106.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. 2000 Reynolds-number independent instability of the boundary layer over a flat surface. Part 2. Optimal perturbations. J. Fluid Mech. 404, 289309.Google Scholar
Malkus, W. V. R. 1956 Outline of a theory of turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 521539.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1967 The interaction of turbulence with strong wind shear. In Proc. URSI-IUGG Coloq. on Atoms. Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation (ed. Yaglom, A. M. & Tatarsky, V. I.), pp. 139154. Nauka.Google Scholar
Monkewitz, P. A., Chauhan, K. A. & Nagib, H. M. 2007 Self-consistent high-Reynolds-number asymptotics for zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 19, 115101.Google Scholar
Morrison, W. R. B., Bullock, K. J. & Kronauer, R. E. 1971 Experimental evidence of waves in the sublayer. J. Fluid Mech. 47, 639656.Google Scholar
Nagib, H. M., Christophorou, C. & Monkewitz, P. A. 2004 High Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers subjected to various pressure-gradient conditions. In IUTAM Symposium on One Hundered Years of Boundary Layer Research (ed. Meier, G. & Sreenivasan, K.), pp. 383–394. Springer.Google Scholar
Österlund, J. M. 1999 Experimental studies of zero-pressure gradient tubulent boundary layer flows. PhD thesis, Royal Insitute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Österlund, J. M., Johansson, A. V., Nagib, H. M. & Hites, M. H. 2000. A note on the overlap region in turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 12, 1.Google Scholar
Pujals, G., García-Villalba, M., Cossu, C. & Depardon, S. In press. A note on optimal transient growth in turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids.Google Scholar
Reddy, S. C., Schmid, P. J., Baggett, J. S. & Henningson, D. S. 1998 On the stability of streamwise streaks and transition thresholds in plane channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 365, 269303.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W. C. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1972 The mechanics of an organized wave in turbulent shear flow. Part 3. Theoretical models and comparisons with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 54 (02), 263288.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W. C. & Tiederman, W. G. 1967 Stability of turbulent channel flow, with application to Malkus's theory. J. Fluid Mech. 27 (02), 253272.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary-Layer Theory. Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.Google Scholar
Smith, J. R. & Metzler, S. P. 1983 The characteristics of low-speed streaks in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 129, 2754.Google Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 2003 Spanwise structure and scale growth in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 3774.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge U. Press, second edition.Google Scholar
Trefethen, L. N., Trefethen, A. E., Reddy, S. C. & Driscoll, T. A. 1993 A new direction in hydrodynamic stability: beyond eigenvalues. Science 261, 578584.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1995 Hydrodynamic stability and turbulence: Beyond transients to a self-sustaining process. Stud. Appl. Math. 95, 319343.Google Scholar
Weideman, J. A. C. & Reddy, S. C. 2000 A MATLAB differentiation matrix suite. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 26 (4), 465519.Google Scholar
White, F. M. 2006 Viscous Fluid Flows, 3rd edition.Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar