Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:59:35.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalized Hensel's lemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Sudesh K. Khanduja  and
Jayanti Saha
Sudesh K. Khanduja
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Study in Mathematics, Panjab UniversitySector – 14 Chandigarh – 160014, India
Jayanti Saha
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Study in Mathematics, Panjab UniversitySector – 14 Chandigarh – 160014, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let (K, v) be a complete, rank-1 valued field with valuation ring Rv, and residue field kv. Let vx be the Gaussian extension of the valuation v to a simple transcendental extension K(x) defined by The classical Hensel's lemma asserts that if polynomials F(x), G0(x), H0(x) in Rv[x] are such that (i) vx(F(x) – G0(x)H0(x)) > 0, (ii) the leading coefficient of G0(x) has v-valuation zero, (iii) there are polynomials A(x), B(x) belonging to the valuation ring of vx satisfying vx(A(x)G0(x) + B(x)H0(x) – 1) > 0, then there exist G(x), H(x) in K[x] such that (a) F(x) = G(x)H(x), (b) deg G(x) = deg G0(x), (c) vx(G(x)–G0(x)) > 0, vx(H(x) – H0(x)) > 0. In this paper, our goal is to prove an analogous result when vx is replaced by any prolongation w of v to K(x), with the residue field of wa transcendental extension of kv.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , October 1999 , pp. 469 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1999

References

REFERENCES

1.Alexandru, V., Popescu, N. and Zaharescu, A., Minimal pairs of definition of a residual transcendental extension of a valuation, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 30 (1990), 207–225.Google Scholar
2.Endler, O., Valuation Theory (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ohm, J., Simple transcendental extensions of valued fields, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 22 (1982), 201–221.Google Scholar
4.Popescu, Liliana and Popescu, Nicolae, Sur la definition des prolongements résiduels transcendents d'une valuation sur un corps K à K(x), Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. R. S. Roumaine 33 (81) (1989), 257–264.Google Scholar
5.Popescu, Liliana and Popescu, Nicolae, On the residual transcendental extensions of a valuation, Key polynomials and augmented valuation, Tsukuba J. Math. 15 (1991), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Popescu, Elena-Liliana, A generalization of Hensel's Lemma, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl. 38 (1993), 801–805.Google Scholar