Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T07:55:26.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mesopotamian Petrology: Stages in the Classification of the Material World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Nicholas Postgate
Affiliation:
Faculty of Oriental StudiesUniversity of CambridgeSidgwick Avenue Cambridge CB3 9DA

Abstract

In the search for cognition in the mute record of archaeology the record of ancient thought transmitted to us by early written texts is an obvious but underexploited resource. An examination of the classification of stones in Mesopotamia gives a rare opportunity to match textual information with the archaeological record, and offers some insights into the organization of thought and classification of knowledge by one of the first literate societies.A group of unshaped stones in the corner of a grave under the floor of a Sumerian dwelling attests to an awareness of natural properties as distinct from functions, whether or not these concepts were already formulated in words. The group of various stones also hints at the concept of a class, the first stirring of a mindset which percolates through Plato and Aristotle to Linnaeus. Already in c. 2000 BC the essential properties of some of these stones were conceptualized and described in a ‘literary’ composition, and the concept of a stable set of properties is linked to traditions relating to the proper source of a stone. Later still, maybe around 1000 BC, the Mesopotamian scribes created a lapidary or ‘Handbook of Stones’ which provides an ordered key to stones in respect of their appearance. Then, or later, the description of their appearance was supplemented by details in which their natural or physical properties were distinguished, along with magical properties some of which were probably transmitted to the Hellenistic world.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aufrère, S., 1991. L'Univers minéral dans la pensée égyptienne. Cairo: Institut Français d'archéologie orientale du Caire.Google Scholar
Biggs, R.D., 1966. Le lapis lazuli dans les textes sumériens archaiques. Revue d'Assyriologie 60, 175–6.Google Scholar
Bittel, K., 1970. Hattusha, the capital of the Hittites. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bjorkman, J.K., 1987. Sargon II's foundation tablets. Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica 18, 8797.Google Scholar
Boehmer, R.M., 1984. Kalkstein für das Urukzeitliche Uruk. Baghdader Mitteilungen 15, 141–7.Google Scholar
Borger, R., 1956. Die Inschriften Asarhaddons Königs von Assyrien. (Archiv für Orientforschung Beiheft 9.) Graz.Google Scholar
Casanova, M., 1991. La vaisselle d'albâtre de Mésopotamie, d'Iran et d'Asie centrale aux III' el II' millénaires av. J.-C. Paris: Éditions Recherche sur les civilisations.Google Scholar
Civil, M., 1972. Supplement to the Introduction to ISET I. Orientalia, Nova Series 41, 8790.Google Scholar
Degraeve, A., 1991. Je t'écris au sujet d'une pierre …. Akkadica 74, 118.Google Scholar
Degraeve, A., 1996. Mesopotamia and its northern neighbours, part I. Akkadica 99100, 1535.Google Scholar
Dole, G.F. & Moran, W.L., 1991. A bowl of alallu-stone. Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie 81, 268–73.Google Scholar
Dunham, S., 1993. Beads for babies. Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie 83, 237–57.Google Scholar
Eichholz, D.E., 1965. Theophrastus De Lapidibus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.S., 1968. Foundation Deposits in Ancient Mesopotamia. New Haven (CT) & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eluère, C., 1986. A prehistoric touchstone from France. Gold Bulletin 19, 5861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, I.L., 1980. The crescent fertile. Archiv fiir Orientforschung 27, 3752.Google Scholar
Finkel, I.L., 1995. In black and white: remarks on the Assur psephomancy ritual. Zeitschrift fiir Assyriologie 85, 271–6.Google Scholar
Frayne, D., 1990. Old Babylonian Period (2003–1595 BC). (Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia. Early Periods, 4.) Toronto, Buffalo & London: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
George, A.R., 1979. Cuneiform texts in the Birmingham City Museum. Iraq 41, 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goody, J., 1977. The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halleux, R. & Schamp, J., 1985. Les lapidaires grecs: Lapidaire orphique, Kérygmes lapidaires d'Orphée, Socrate el Denys, Lapidaire nautique, Damigéron-évax. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Heimpel, W., 1982. A first step in the diorite question. Revue d'Assyriologie 76, 65–7.Google Scholar
Heimpel, W., 1987. Das Untere Meer. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 77, 2291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, M., 1989. Die Steingefässe aus Süd- und Mittelmesopotamien als Inschriftenträger der Frühdynastischen Zeit. Baghdader Mitteilungen 20, 197224.Google Scholar
Hilprecht, H.V., 1893. Old Babylonian inscriptions chiefly from Nippur, part I. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 18, 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmyard, E.J. & Mandeville, D.C., 1927. Avicennae de congelatione el conglulatione lapidum, being sections of the Kitâb-al-Shifâ. Paris: P. Geuthner.Google Scholar
Horowitz, W., 1992. Two Abnu šikinšu fragments and related matters. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 82, 112–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.V. Kinnier, 1962. The Kurba'il Statue of Shalmaneser III. Iraq 24, 90115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köcher, F., 1963. Die babylonisch-assyrische Medizin in Texten und Untersuchungen, vols. 1–2. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koldewey, R., 1901. Die Pflastersteine von Aiburschabu in Babylon. (Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Orientgesellschaft 2.) Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Landsberger, B., 1965. Tin and lead: the adventures of two vocables. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 24, 285–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberger, B., 1967. Über Farben in Sumerisch-Akkadischen. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 21, 139–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberger, B. & Reiner, E., 1970. Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon, vol. 10. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute.Google Scholar
Langdon, S.H., 1912. Die neubabylonischen Königsinschriften. (Vorderasiatische Bibliothek 4.) Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Limet, H., 1984. Amulettes babyloniennes et lapidaire Zoroastrien. Orientalia J. Duchesne-Guillemin Oblata 1, 327–39.Google Scholar
Livingstone, A., 1986. Mystical and Mythological Explanatory Works of Assyrian and Babylonian Scholars. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Luckenbill, D.D., 1924. The Annals of Sennacherib. (Publication 2.) Chicago (IL): Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Magen, Y., 1994. The stone vessel industry during the Second Temple Period, in ‘Purity broke out in Israel’ (Tractate Shabbat, 13b): Stone Vessels in the Late Second Temple Period, by Rimon, O., Magen, Y. & Rahmani, L.Y.. (Catalogue 9.) Haifa: The Reuben and Edith Hecht Museum, University of Haifa, 7*27*.Google Scholar
Martin, H.P., Moon, J. & Postgate, J.N., 1985. Graves 1 to 99. (Abu Salabikh Excavations 2.) London: British School of Archaeology in Iraq.Google Scholar
Meissner, B., 1922. Lexikographische Studien. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 25, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, A.R., 1994. The Eponyms of the Assyrian Empire 910–612 BC. (State Archives of Assyria Studies II.) Helsinki: The Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project.Google Scholar
Moorey, P.R.S., 1994. Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: the Archaeological Evidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mullo-Weir, C.J., 1929. Fragment of an expiation ritual against sickness. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 1929, 281–4.Google Scholar
Nissen, H.J., 1981. Bemerkungen zur Listenliteratur Vorderasiens im 3. Jahrtausend, in La lingua di Ebla, ed. Cagni, L.. Napoli: Instituto Universitario Orientale, 99108.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A.L., 1963. Mesopotamian conchology. Orientalia NS 32, 407–12.Google Scholar
Parrot, A., 1956. Mission Archéologique de Mari I: Le temple d'Ishtar. Paris: P. Geuthner.Google Scholar
Postgate, J.N., 1992. Early Mesopotamia: Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potts, T.F., 1989. Foreign stone vessels of the late third millennium BC from southern Mesopotamia: their origin and mechanisms of exchange. Iraq 51, 123–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, T.F., 1994. Mesopotamia and the East: an Archaeological and Historical Study of Foreign Relations c. 3400–2000 BC. (Monograph 37.) Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology.Google Scholar
Pritchard, J.B., 1969. Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raineri, Count A., 1818. Fior de penseri sulle pietre preziose. Opera composta dal dotto Imam Ahmed ben Iusuf Teifascite Anasite (Italian translation of Kitāb ‘azhār al-’ afkār fī jawāhir al-‘ahjār — l-’ahmad bin yīusuf 'al-tīfāŝī 'al-matu fī 'ām 651 h. Florence. (Reprint Poland 1906.)Google Scholar
Reiner, E., 1956. ‘Lipŝur’ litanies. Journal of Near Eastern studies 15, 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiner, E., 1995. Astral Magic in Babylonia. (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 85/iv.) Philadelphia (PA): American Philosophical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, A., 1952. Babylonian horoscopes. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 61, 4975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soden, W. von, 1936. Leistung und Grenze sumerischer und babylonischer Wissenschaft. Die Welt als Geschichte 2, 411–64, 509–77.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E., 1965. A new inscription of Ŝilhak-Inŝuŝinak. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 19, 31–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinkeller, P., 1982. The question of Marhaŝi: a contribution to the historical geography of Iran in the third millennium BC. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 72, 237–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinkeller, P., 1987. The stone ‘pirig-gùn’. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 77, 92–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, F.J., 1937. Votive and Historical Texts from Babylonia and Assyria. (Yale Oriental Series. Babylonian Texts 9.) New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stol, M., 1979. On Trees, Mountains and Millstones in the Ancient Near East. Leiden: Ex Oriente Lux.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stol, M., 1993. Epilepsy in Babylonia. Gröningen: Styx Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallon, F., 1995. Les pierres précieuses de l'Orient ancien des Sumériens aux Sassanides. Paris: Réunion des Musées Nationaux.Google Scholar
Thompson, R.C., 1929. The excavations on the temple of Nabû at Nineveh. Archaeologia 79, 103–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R.C., 1936. A Dictionary of Assyrian Chemistry and Geology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thureau-Dangin, F., 1931. Arslan-Tash. Paris: P. Geuthner.Google Scholar
van Dijk, J.J.A., 1983. LUGAL UD ME-LÁM-bi NIR-GÁL. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Vanstiphout, H.L.J., 1990. The Mesopotamian debate poems: a general preserntation, part I. Acta Sumerologica 12, 271318.Google Scholar
Weidner, E.F., 1967. Gestirn-Darstellungen auf babylonischen Tontafeln. (Öst. Akad. d. Wissenschaften, Phil.-Hist. Klasse, Sitzungsberichte 254,2.) Vienna: Böhlaus Nachf.Google Scholar
Weissbach, F.H., 1903. Babylonische Miscellen. (Wissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 4.) Berlin: J.C. Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Winter, I.J., forthcoming. Dark luster: the aesthetic value of lapis lazuli in Mesopotamia, in Pierres précieuses (or similar title), ed. Caubet, A.. Paris: Musée du Louvre.Google Scholar