Epidemiology and Infection
- Epidemiology and Infection (2005), 133 : pp 401-407
- Copyright © 2005 Cambridge University Press
- DOI: 10.1017/S0950268804003632 (About DOI)
- Published online: 02 February 2005
Sensitivity of the Swedish statutory surveillance system for communicable diseases 1998–2002, assessed by the capture–recapture method
AbstractTo assess the sensitivity of the Swedish surveillance system, four notifiable communicable diseases in Sweden were examined during 1998–2002 with the two-sources capture–recapture method, based on parallel clinical and laboratory notifications. The sensitivity (proportion of diagnosed diseases actually being notified) was highest for salmonellosis (99·9%), followed by meningococcal infection (98·7%), and tularaemia (98·5%). For penicillin-resistant pneumococci, introduced as a notifiable disease in 1996, the overall sensitivity was 93·4% – increasing from 86·5% in 1998 to 98·5% in 2002. The system benefited from parallel reporting, with a sensitivity of clinical and laboratory notifications alone (all diseases combined) of 91·6% and 95·9% respectively. The sensitivity of both clinical and laboratory notifications was markedly higher in counties using the national electronic reporting system, SmiNet. Thus, sensitivity was higher for diseases with a long tradition of reporting, and there is a run-in period after a new disease becomes notifiable. (Accepted December 2 2004)Correspondence: c1 Deputy State Epidemiologist for Sweden, Department of Epidemiology, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control (SMI), SE-171 82 Solna, Sweden. (Email: karl.ekdahl@smi.ki.se) |
