Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:03:31.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Designing creative artificial systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2005

PIETER H.G. VAN LANGEN ,
NIEK J.E. WIJNGAARDS  and
FRANCES M.T. BRAZIER
PIETER H.G. VAN LANGEN
Affiliation:
Intelligent Interactive Distributed Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
NIEK J.E. WIJNGAARDS
Affiliation:
Intelligent Interactive Distributed Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
FRANCES M.T. BRAZIER
Affiliation:
Intelligent Interactive Distributed Systems Group, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can artificial systems be creative? Can they be designed to be creative on their own? What are the requirements of such creative artificial systems? To be able to support humans who are expected to deliver creative solutions, or to automate part of their tasks, this paper presents a proposal for creativity requirements that provide a basis for designing creative artificial systems.

Keywords

AgentCreativityDesignInteractivityLearningSelf-Organization
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , August 2004 , pp. 217 - 225
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aihara, K. & Hori, K. (1998). Enhancing creativity through reorganizing mental space concealed in a research notes stack. Knowledge-Based Systems 11(7–8), 469–478.Google Scholar
Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 357–376.Google Scholar
Amigoni, F. & Schiaffonati, V. (2003). The Minerva multiagent system for supporting creativity in museums organisation. Proc. IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in AI and Cognitive Science, pp. 65–74, Acapulco.
Besemer, S.P. & Treffinger, D.J. (1981). Analysis of creative products: review and synthesis. Journal of Creative Behavior 15, 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, M.A. (1991). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Boden, M.A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 103(1–2), 347–356.Google Scholar
Bonabeau, E. & Theraulaz, G. (2000). Swarm smarts. Scientific American 282(3), 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, R.P. & Nagasundaram, M. (1998). Research in creativity and GSS. Proc. 31st Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS), Vol. 6, pp. 391–405.
Bracewell, R.H. & Sharpe, J.E.E. (1996). Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitative scheme generation—”Schemebuilder.” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 333–346.Google Scholar
Brazier, F.M.T. & Wijngaards, N.J.E. (2001). Designing self-modifying agents. Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V (Heron Island '01), pp. 93–112.
Brazier, F.M.T. & Wijngaards, N.J.E. (2002). Automated (re-)design of software agents. Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID '02), pp. 503–520.
Campbell, M.I., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (1998). A-Design: Theory and implementation of an adaptive, agent-based method of conceptual design. Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID '98), pp. 579–598.
Candy, L. (1997). Computers and creativity support: knowledge, visualisation and collaboration. Knowledge-Based Systems 10(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Candy, L. & Edmonds, E.A. (2000). Creativity enhancement with emerging technologies. Communications of the ACM 43(8), 62–65.Google Scholar
Candy, L., Ferran, B., Mottram, J., Edmonds, E., Haworth, J., & Pettigrew, J. (2002). Panel: Research into art and technology. Proc. Fourth Conf. Creativity and Cognition, pp. 25–30.
Carley, K.M., Prietula, M.J., & Lin, Z. (1998). Design versus cognition: The interaction of agent cognition and organizational design on organizational performance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
Chaplin, R.V., Li, M., Oh, V.K., Sharpe, J.E.E., & Yan, X.T. (1994). Integrated computer support for interdisciplinary system design. Proc. Third Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID '94), pp. 591–608.
Cho, S.-B. (2002). Towards creative evolutionary systems with interactive genetic algorithm. Applied Intelligence 16(2), 129–138.Google Scholar
Cohen, H. (2002). A self-defining game for one player: On the nature of creativity and the possibility of creative computer programs. Leonardo 35(1), 59–64.Google Scholar
Colton, S., Pease, A., & Ritchie, G. (2001). The effect of input knowledge on creativity. Proc. ICCBR 2001 Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (Bento & C., Cardoso, A., Eds.). Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. Handbook of Creativity (Sternberg, R.J., Ed.), pp. 313–335. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Dias de Figueiredo, A. & Campos, J. (2001). The serendipity equations. Proc. ICCBR 2001 Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (Bento, C. & Cardoso, A., Eds.). Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.
Dorst, K. & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22(5), 425–437.Google Scholar
Duffy, A.H.B. (1997). The “what” and “how” of learning in design. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 12(3), 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, E. & Candy, L. (2002). Creativity, art practice, and knowledge. Communications of the ACM 45(10), 91–95.Google Scholar
Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., & Michel, F. (2004). From agents to organizations: an organizational view of multi-agent systems. Proc. Fourth Int. Workshop on Agent-Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE '03), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2935 (Giorgini, P., Muller, J.P. & Odell, J., Eds.), pp. 214–230. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. (1992). Creative Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fischer, G. (2001). External and shareable artifacts as opportunities for social creativity in communities of interest. Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V (Heron Island '01) (Gero, J.S. & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 67–89. Sydney, Australia: University of Sidney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
Fischer, G. & Nakakoji, K. (1997). Computational environments supporting creativity in the context of lifelong learning and design. Knowledge-Based Systems 10(1), 21–28.Google Scholar
Franklin, S. & Graesser, A. (1997). Is it an agent, or just a program? A taxonomy for autonomous agents. In Intelligent Agents III: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1135 (Müller, J.P., Wooldridge, M.J. & Jennings, N.R., Eds.), pp. 21–35. Berlin: Springer–Verlag.
Gabora, L. (2002). Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Creativity and Cognition, pp. 126–133.
Gero, J.S. (1996). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design: concepts and framework. Knowledge-Based Systems 9(7), 435–448.Google Scholar
Gero, J.S. (2000). Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 64(1), 183–196.Google Scholar
Gero, J.S. (2002). Computational models of creative designing based on situated cognition. Proc. Fourth Conf. Creativity and Cognition, pp. 3–10.
Gero, J.S. & Kannengiesser, U. (2002). The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Proc. Seventh Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID '02) (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 89–104. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Goel, A. (1997). Design, analogy, and creativity. IEEE Expert 12(3), 62–70.Google Scholar
Grecu, D.L. & Brown, D.C. (1996). Learning by single function agents during spring design. Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID '96), pp. 409–428.
Greene, S.L. (2002). Characteristics of applications that support creativity. Communications of the ACM 45(10), 100–104.Google Scholar
Holland, J.H. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kletke, M.G., Mackay, J.M., Barr, S.H., & Jones, B. (2001). Creativity in the organization: the role of individual creative problem solving and computer support. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 55(3), 217–237.Google Scholar
Kirton, M.J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 61(5), 622–629.Google Scholar
Lawson, B. (1997). How Designers Think. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
Liu, Y.-T. (2000). Creativity or novelty? Design Studies 21(3), 261–276.Google Scholar
Luck, M., McBurney, P., & Preist, C. (2003). Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing—A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing. Southampton, UK: Agent Link.
Macedo, L. & Cardoso, A. (2002). Assessing creativity: The importance of unexpected novelty. Proc. ECAI 2002 Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, pp. 31–38.
Pease, A., Winterstein, D., & Colton, S. (2001). Evaluating machine creativity. Proc. ICCBR 2001 Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (Bento & C., Cardoso, A., Eds.). Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.
Perkins, D.N. (1981). The Mind's Best Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ram, A., Wills, L., Domeshek, E., Nersessian, N., & Kolodner, J. (1995). Understanding the creative mind: A review of Margaret Boden's Creative Mind [book review]. Artificial Intelligence 79(1), 111–128.Google Scholar
Reffat, R. & Gero, J.S. (2000). Computational situated learning in design—Application to architectural shape semantics. Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID '00) (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 589–610. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Richards, D., van Splunter, S., Brazier, F.M.T., & Sabou, M. (2003). Composing web services using an agent factory. Proc. AAMAS 2003 Workshop on Web Services and Agent-Based Engineering (WSABE '03), pp. 57–66, Melbourne.
Santanen, E.L., Briggs, R.O., & de Vreede, G.-J. (2002). Toward an understanding of creative solution generation. Proc. Thirty-fifth Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS '02), Vol. 8, pp. 221–230.
Saunders, R. & Gero, J.S. (2001). Artificial creativity: A synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design V (Heron Island '01) (Gero, J.S. & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 113–139. Sydney: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
Saunders, R. & Gero, J.S. (2002). How to study artificial creativity. Proc. Fourth Conf. Creativity and Cognition, pp. 80–87.
Shneiderman, B. (2002). Creativity support tools. Communications of the ACM 45(10), 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, S.K. & Duffy, A.H.B. (2000). Evaluating a model of learning in design using protocol analysis. Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID '00) (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 455–477. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Simon, H.A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stefik, M. (1995). Introduction to Knowledge Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Suwa, M., Gero, J.S., & Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies 21(6), 539–567.Google Scholar
Talbot, R.J. (1997). Taking style on board (or how to get used to the idea of creative adaptors and uncreative innovators). Creativity and Innovation Management 6(3), 177–184.Google Scholar
Tang, H.-H. & Gero, J.S. (2002). A cognitive method to measure potential creativity in designing. Proc. ECAI 2002 Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, pp. 47–54, Lyon.
Thomas, J.C., Lee, A., & Danis, C. (2002). Enhancing creative design via software tools. Communications of the ACM 45(10), 112–115.Google Scholar
Weatherall, A. (1998). Creative problem solving using GroupSystems. Proc. 31st Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, Vol. 1, pp. 588–595.
Wiggins, G.A. (2003). Categorising creative systems. Proc. IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Creative Systems: Approaches to Creativity in Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, Acapulco.
Wooldridge, M.J. & Jennings, N.R. (1995). Intelligent agents: theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2), 115–152.Google Scholar