Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:34:29.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of voice onset time by early bilinguals to distinguish homorganic stops in Canadian English and Canadian French

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

ANDREA A. N. MACLEOD  and
CAROL STOEL-GAMMON
ANDREA A. N. MACLEOD*
Affiliation:
University of Washington
CAROL STOEL-GAMMON
Affiliation:
University of Washington
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Andrea A. N. MacLeod, Département de réadaptation, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1K 7P4, Canada. E-mail: andrea.macleod@rea.ulaval.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the extent to which bilingual speakers maintain language-specific phonological contrasts for homorganic stops when a cue is shared across both languages. To this end, voice onset time (VOT) was investigated in three groups of participants: early bilinguals speakers of Canadian French and Canadian English (n = 8), monolingual speakers of Canadian English (n = 8), and monolingual speakers of Canadian French (n = 7). Three questions were targeted: What are the general patterns of VOT production in bilingual and monolinguals? Do bilingual speakers produce different mean VOT than monolinguals? Do bilingual speakers produce different variability in VOT than monolinguals? Acoustic measurements of VOT were made from monosyllabic English and French words with word-initial bilabial or coronal stop consonants. The results indicate that the early bilingual speakers maintain monolingual-like phonemic contrasts, but that they exhibit more variation within categories than monolingual speakers.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 53 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auzou, P., Ozsancak, C., Morris, R. J., Jan, M., Eustache, F., & Hannequin, D. (2000). Voice onset time in aphasia, apraxia of speech and dysarthria: a review. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 14, 131–150.Google Scholar
Baligand, R. (1995). Problèmes de consonantisme en Franco-Ontarien: La variation du /R/. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée, 12, 23–36.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5 341–345.Google Scholar
Brown, M. B., & Forsythe, A. B. (1974). Robust tests for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364–367.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Yeni-komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French–English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 207–229.Google Scholar
Cho, T., Jun, S.-A., & Ladefoged, P. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 198–228.Google Scholar
Davis, K. (1995). Phonetic and phonological contrasts in the acquisition of voicing: Voice onset time production in Hindi and English. Journal of Child Language, 22, 275–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1991). Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 89, 395–411.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. (pp. 233–272). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Fougeron, C. (2001). Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, J., & Dardarandanda, R. (1984). Voice onset time in aphasia: Thai. II. Production. Brain and Language, 23, 177–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haag, W. K. (1979). An articulatory experiment on voice onset time in German stop consonants. Phonetica, 36, 169–181.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hazan, V. L., & Boulakia, G. (1993). Perception and production of a voicing contrast by French–English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 36, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. (2003). Acoustic and auditory phonetics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kessinger, R. H., & Blumstein, S. E. (1997). Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, A. A. N., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (2005). Are bilinguals different? What VOT tells us about simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 3, 118–127.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1969). How can we measure the extent of a person's bilingual proficiency? In Kelly, L. G. (Ed.), Description and measurement of bilingualism. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Madiesson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magloire, J., & Green, K. P. (1999). A cross-language comparison of speaking rate effects on the production of voice onset time in English and Spanish. Phonetica, 56, 158–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, R. B., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1973). Bias in the analysis of repeated-measures designs: Some alternative approaches. Child Development, 44, 401–415.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R., & Beniak, E. (1991). Le français en Ontario. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée, 12, 139–164.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Ryalls, J., Cliché, A., Fortier-Blanc, J., Colombe, I., & Prud'Hommeaux, A. (1997). Voice-onset time in younger and older French-speaking Canadians. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 11, 205–212.Google Scholar
Ryalls, J., Zipprer, A., & Baldauff, P. (1997). A preliminary investigation of the effects of gender and race on voice onset time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40 642–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistics Canada. (2001). Retrieved January 1, 2006, from http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/ind01/l3_3867_2573.htm?hili_noneGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sundara, M. (2005). Acoustic-phonetics of coronal stops: A cross-language study of Canadian English and Canadian French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1026–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundara, M., Polka, L., & Baum, S. (2006). Production of coronal stops by simultaneous bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, B. (1987). The sounds of French: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Alphen, P. M., & Smits, R. (2004). Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: The role of prevoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 455–491.Google Scholar
Walker, D. C. (1984). The pronunciation of Canadian French. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar