Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:51:40.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ‘House’ and Zulu Political Structure in the Nineteenth Century1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2009

Adam Kuper
Adam Kuper
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The rise of the Zulu power in the early nineteenth century has conventionally been treated as the outstanding example of a contemporary southern African process of ‘state-formation’, which was associated with revolutionary social changes. This paper advances an alternative view, that there were strong continuities with established forms of chieftaincy in the region, and in particular that the Zulu political system was based on a traditional, pan-Nguni homestead form of organization.

The Zulu homestead was divided into right and left sections, each with its own identity and destiny. This opposition was mapped into the layout of ordinary homesteads and royal settlements. It was carried through into the organization of regiments. The homestead and its segments provided both the geographical and the structural nodes of the society. The developmental cycle of the homestead ideally followed a set pattern, creating a fresh alignment of units in each generation. The points of segmentation were provided by the ‘houses’, constituted for each major wife and her designated heir. Each of these houses represented the impact, within the homestead, of relationships sealed by marriage with outside groups, whose leaders threw their weight behind particular factions in the political processes within the family.

Type
Reinterpreting South African History
Information
The Journal of African History , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , November 1993 , pp. 469 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Bryant, A. T., Olden Times in Zululand and Natal (London, 1929), 70–1.Google Scholar

3 Wright, John and Hamilton, Carolyn, ‘Traditions and transformations: the Phongolo-Mzimbkhulu region in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries’, in Duminy, Andrew and Guest, Bill (eds.), Natal and Zululand: From Earliest Times to 1910: A New History (Pietermaritzburg, 1989), 49–82, citation, 57.Google Scholar

4 For the Zulu case see, e.g. Guy, J. J., ‘The political structure of the Zulu kingdom during the reign of Cetshwayo kaMpande’, in Peires, J. (ed.), Before and After Shaka: Papers in Nguni History (Grahamstown, 1979), 49–74Google Scholar; Guy, J. J., ‘Ecological factors in the rise of Shaka and the Zulu kingdom’, in Marks, S. and Atmore, A. (eds.), Economy and Society in Pre-industrial South Africa (London, 1980), 102–19.Google Scholar

5 A valuable critical survey of these hypotheses, with special reference to the rise of the Zulu state, may be found in Wright, John, ‘The dynamics of power and conflict in the Thukela-Mzinkhulu region in the late 18th and early 19th centuries: a critical reconstruction’ (Doctoral thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, 1989).Google Scholar The arguments are summed up in Wright and Hamilton, ‘Traditions and transformations’, 59–74.

6 See Cobbing, Julian, ‘The mfecane as alibi: thoughts on Dithakong and Mbolompo’, J. Afr. Hist., XXIX (1988), 487–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Cf. Eldredge, Elizabeth A., ‘The “mfecane” reconsidered’, J. Afr. Hist., XXXIII (1992), 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Hamilton, Carolyn Anne, ‘The character and objects of Chaka’, J. Afr. Hist., XXXIII (1992), 37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 For a thorough discussion of oral traditions among the northern Nguni, see Hamilton, Carolyn, ‘Ideology, oral traditions and the struggle for power in the early Zulu kingdom’ (MA thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, 1985).Google Scholar

8 Hall, Martin, The Changing Past: Farmers, Kings and Traders in Southern Africa, 200–1860 (Cape Town, 1987), 124–8.Google Scholar

9 Maggs, T., ‘The Iron Age farming communities’, in Duminy and Guest, Natal and Zululand, 28–48.Google Scholar

10 Kuper, Hilda, An African Aristocracy: Rank Among the Swazi (London, 1947), 11.Google Scholar

11 See Kuper, A., Wives for Cattle: Bridewealth and Marriage in Southern Africa (London, 1982), ch. 4Google Scholar; Kuper, A., ‘Lineage theory: a critical retrospect’, Annual Review for Anthropology, 11 (1982), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The development of this theory is the subject of my book, The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformations of an Illusion (London, 1988).Google Scholar

12 Hammond-Tooke, D. W., ‘In search of the lineage: the Cape Nguni case’, Man, XIX (1984), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Wright, John and Manson, Andrew, The Hlubi Chiefdom in Zululand-Natal: A History (Ladysmith, 1983).Google Scholar

14 For some relevant early Africanist work upon which this new discourse built, see Goody, J. (ed.), The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups (Cambridge, 1958)Google Scholar; Gray, R. F. and Gulliver, P. H. (eds.), The Family Estate in Africa: Studies in the Role of Property in Family Structure and Lineage Continuity (London, 1964).Google Scholar The modern argument was inspired largely by Lévi-Strauss and he provides a convenient summary of his views in the entry ‘Maison’, in Bonte, Pierre and Izard, Michel (eds.), Dictionnaire de l'ethologie et de l'anthropologie (Paris, 1991).Google Scholar See also his essay ‘L'organisation sociale des Kwakiutl’, in La voie des masques (Paris, 1984)Google Scholar; and several essays in his collection, Anthropology and Myth (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar Cf. Bourdieu, P., The Logic of Practice (Cambridge, 1990), especially 271–83Google Scholar; Macdonald, C. (ed.), De la hutte au palais (Paris, 1987)Google Scholar; Gudeman, S. and Rivera, A., Conversations in Columbia: The Domestic Economy in Life and Text (Cambridge, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 ‘Symbolic dimensions of the Southern Bantu homestead’, Africa, L (1980), 8–23Google Scholar, reprinted as chapter 10 (‘The system on the ground’) in Wives for Cattle (London, 1982).Google Scholar

16 See, e.g. Huffman, T., ‘Archaeological evidence and conventional explanations of southern Bantu settlement patterns’, Africa, LVI (1986), 280–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hall, M., The Changing Past, 69–73.Google Scholar

17 Holleman, J. F., ‘Die twee-einheidsbeginsel in die sosiale en politieke samelweing van die Zulu’, Bantu Studies, XIV (1940), 31–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Die Zulu isigodi’, Bantu Studies, XV (1941), 91–118, 245–276.Google Scholar

18 Holleman, J. F., ‘The structure of the Zulu ward’, African Studies, XIV (1986), 109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19 Holleman, J. F., ‘Die twee-einheidsbeginsel’, 31.Google Scholar

20 Cf. Bryant on the u Yise wamuzi, in ‘The Zulu family and state organization’, Bantu Studies, L (1923), 47–51.Google Scholar

21 This particular case-study is expanded, with detailed genealogical and census material, in the two-part paper published by Holleman in 1941. The English translation of part one of that paper (Holleman, 1986) fills out the brief outline I have given here.

22 Holleman, , ‘Die twee-eeinheidsbeginsel’, 65–7.Google Scholar A case in point can be reconstructed in some detail from the Stuart Archive. See Webb, C. de B. and Wright, J. B. (eds.), The James Stuart Archive (4 vols.) (Pietermaritzburg and Durban, 1976–1986), iv, 84–6.Google Scholar

23 Holleman, , ‘Die twee-eenheidsbeginsel’, 65.Google Scholar

24 Barnes, J. A., Politics in a Changing Society: A Political History of the Fort Jameson Ngoni (London, 1954), 6.Google Scholar

25 Ibid. 9–12.

26 Reader, D. H., Zulu Tribe in Transition: The Makhanya of Southern Natal (Manchester, 1966), 90.Google Scholar

27 Ibid. 87–90.

28 Four volumes of the James Stuart Archive see n. 22, have been published by the University of Natal Press. More volumes are planned. This is a resource which has transformed the basis of Zulu historical scholarship.

29 Bryant, , Olden Times, 39–40.Google Scholar

30 The James Stuart Archive, vol. ii, 210.

31 The James Stuart Archive, vol. iii, 265.

32 Bryant, , Olden Times, 45–62.Google Scholar

33 Ibid. 55.

34 Ibid. 119–20.

35 Ibid. 37, 43.

36 Kuper, Wives for Cattle, ch. 7.

37 The James Stuart Archive, vol. iii, 249–57.

38 Bryant, , Olden Times, 39–40.Google Scholar

39 Grout, Lewis, The IsiZulu: A Grammar of the Zulu Language (London, 1859), 377Google Scholar; Bryant, , Olden Times, 34–5Google Scholar; James Stuart Archive, vol. iv, 169.

40 Bryant, , Olden Times, 41.Google Scholar

41 Spohr, O. (ed.), The Natal Diaries of Dr. W. H. I. Bleek (Cape Town, 1965), 82.Google Scholar

42 Hamilton, Carolyn, ‘Ideology’, 120.Google Scholar

43 Bryant, , Olden Times, 55.Google Scholar

44 Ibid. 63.

45 Ibid. 203; Stuart Archives, vol. ii, 216.

46 Bryant, , Olden Times, 163Google Scholar; James Stuart Archive, i, 176–7; ii, 186–7; iii, 232, 245; iv, 106, 198, 218.

47 Kuper, Hilda, An African Aristocracy, 14.Google Scholar

48 The most interesting analysis of the isiGodlo and of marriage is to be found in Hamilton, ‘Ideology’, ch. seven.

49 James Stuart Archive, iii, 232, 245; iv, 48, 106, 198, 218.

50 Bryant, , Olden Times, 320–1Google Scholar; James Stuart Archive, i, 149–50; Hilda Kuper, An African Aristocracy, 14.

51 Hamilton, , ‘Ideology’, 449.Google Scholar There was also the house of Hamu. Hamu was fathered by Mpande for his full brother, Nzibe, who had died without an heir. Hamu was treated by both Mpande and Cetshwayo as an independent chief, and even had his own isiGodlo. He became a major player in the Zululand of Cetshwayo. Nzibe would have represented the junior house of Mpande's side of Senzangakhona's family, and so Hamu was a largely autonomous baron in the generations of Mpande and Mpande's sons. See Laband, J. and Thompson, P., ‘The reduction of Zululand: 1878–1904’, in Duminy and Guest, Natal and Zululand, 205–15Google Scholar; James Stuart Archive, iii, 267; iv, 117–8, 301.

52 James Stuart Archive, iii, 203. Cf. 102–4, 267.

53 Laband, J., ‘The cohesion of the Zulu polity under the impact of the Anglo-Zulu war: a reassessment’, Journal of Natal and Zulu History, VIII (1985), 34.Google Scholar