Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T05:57:42.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From reifying mental pictures to reifying spatial models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2005

Zenon W. Pylyshyn*
Affiliation:
Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University at New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ08854-8020

Abstract:

Assuming that the vehicle of imaginal thought is a spatial model may not be quite as egregious an error as assuming it is a two-dimensional picture, but it represents no less a reification error. Because the model is not a literal physical layout, one is still owed an explanation of why spatial properties hold in the model – whether because of architectural constraints or by stipulation. The difference is like the difference between explaining behavior from a principle and predicting it by looking it up in a list. In the latter case no purpose is being served by calling it a mental model.

Type
Author's Response
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Commentary onZenon W. Pylyshyn (2002). Mental imagery? In search of a theory. BBS 25(2):157–182.

References

Anderson, J. (1978) Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review 85:249–77. [MK]Google Scholar
Baker, S. C., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J. & Dolan, R. J. (1996) Active representation of shape and spatial location in man. Cerebral Cortex 6:612–19. [MK]Google Scholar
Bransford, J. D. & Johnson, M. K. (1973). Considerations of some problems of comprehension: In: Visual information processing, ed. Chase, W.. Academic Press. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J. & O’Keefe, J. (2001) A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events. NeuroImage 14:439–53. [MK]Google Scholar
Goel, V. & Dolan, R. J. (2001) Functional neuroanatomy of three-term relational reasoning. Neuropsychologia 39:901909. [MK]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991) Deduction. Erlbaum. [MK]Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J. & Tabossi, P. (1989) Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantifiers. Psychological Review 96:658–73. [MK]Google Scholar
Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R. & Meiser, T. (1997) Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 3:947. [MK]Google Scholar
Knauff, M. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002) Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory and Cognition 30:363–71. [MK]Google Scholar
Knauff, M., Jola, C., Strube, G., Rauh, R. & Schlieder, C. (2004) The psychological validity of qualitative spatial reasoning in one dimension. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4:167–88. [MK]Google Scholar
Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R. & Greenlee, M. W. (2002) Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 13:203–12. [MK]Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) Image and brain. MIT Press. [MK]Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984) Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. MIT Press. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (Ed.) (1987) The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Ablex. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2003) Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [rZWP]Google Scholar
Rips, L. J. (1994) The psychology of proof. MIT Press. [MK]Google Scholar
Schlieder, C. (1998) Diagrammatic transformation processes on two-dimensional relational maps. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 9:4559. [MK]Google Scholar
Vandierendonck, A. & de Vooght, G. (1997) Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with temporal and spatial contents. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A:803–20. [MK]Google Scholar
Xing, J. & Andersen, R. A. (2000) Models of the posterior parietal cortex which perform multimodal integration and represent space in several coordinate frames. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12:601–14. [MK]Google Scholar