Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T08:52:45.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SIDNEY HOOK, ROBERT NOZICK, AND THE PARADOXES OF FREEDOM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2005

John Patrick Diggins
Affiliation:
History, The Graduate Center, City University of New York

Abstract

Diggins observes in this essay that, while Nozick and Hook shared a passion for freedom and for understanding liberty in all its complexities, the two philosophers, one a libertarian and the other a democratic socialist, occupied different worlds when it came to how they viewed property and power. Nozick believed that freedom and justice depended upon a minimal state that would be severely restricted in its exercise of power. Sidney Hook never renounced his conviction, born of his early attraction to Marxism, that truly dangerous power is wielded not principally by government but by private individuals of great material wealth: by industrialists. Diggins examines the divergent views of these two seminal thinkers on such issues as human rights, private property, democracy, and judicial review. The differences are profound, yet they shared a common interest in the life of the mind and in exploring such hoary philosophical topics as free will versus determinism and the grounding of moral values.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)