Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:58:24.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Middle Classes and the Welfare State under Conservative and Labour Governments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Julian Le Grand
Affiliation:
ST/ICERD, London School of Economics
David Winter
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Bristol

Abstract

The Conservative Government elected in Britain in 1979 wished to change the extent and pattern of government expenditure. We use econometric techniques to investigate whether it did so in the period up to 1984, concentrating attention on the welfare state. We also test the hypothesis that the observed changes favoured the middle classes. After discussing the channels by which the middle classes influence government policy, a model of government behaviour is outlined. The theoretical model indicates the forms of specification error that we might expect in our econometric results, which, in turn, suggest that the Conservatives tended to favour the middle classes, while the previous Labour administrations did not. However, the estimates for the Labour period appear to be misspecified, but those for the Conservative period survived tests of misspecification.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AA (1985), Annual Abstract of Statistics. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B., Hills, J. and Le Grand, J. (1986), ‘The welfare state in Britain 1970–1985:extent and effectiveness’. London School of Economics: Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper No. 9.Google Scholar
Bacon, R. W. and Eltis, W. (1976) Britain's Economic Problems (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Black, D. (1980), Inequalities in Health, report of a research working party, chaired by Sir Douglas Black. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Breusch, T. S. and Pagan, A. R. (1979), ‘A simple test of heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation’, Econometrica 47, 12871294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BS (1984), Business Statistics: A Supplement to the Survey of Current Business, Bureau of Economic Affairs, US Dept of Commerce, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1985), ‘The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 1984’, Economic Trends, No. 386, 12, 99115.Google Scholar
Chesher, A. and Jewitt, I. D. (1986), ‘The bias of the heteroscedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimator’, University of Bristol Discussion Paper, No.86/176.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1967), Inside Bureaucracy. New York: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, P. (1985), ‘Bureaucrats, budgets and the growth of the state: reconstructing an instrumental model’, British Journal of Political Science 15, 299328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, P. (1986), ‘The growth of sectoral cleavages and the stabilisation of state expenditures’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4, 129144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, J. P., Pashardes, P. and Smith, R. P. (1984), ‘Needs, costs and bureaucracy: the allocation of public consumption in the UK’, Economic Journal 94, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EP (1979, 1984), The Government's Expenditure Plans, Cmnd 7439 and 9143 II. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
ET (1985), Economic Trends: Annual Supplement. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
FS (1977, 1982, 1985) Financial Statistics. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
HPSSE (1976, 1977, 1978, 1982, 1985), Health and Personal Social Service Statistics for England. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J., (1982), The Strategy of Equality. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J., (1984), ‘The future of the welfare state’, New Society, 68, 385–6.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. and Winter, D. (1977), ‘Towards an economic model of local government behaviour’, Policy and Politics, 5, 2329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grand, J., and Winter, D. (1987), ‘The middle classes and the welfare state’, London School of Economics: Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper No. 14.Google Scholar
Mueller, D. (1979), Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
NIE (1984, 1985), UK National Income Accounts. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Niskanen, W. (1973), Bureaucracy and Representative Government. New York: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
OECD (1978, 1981, 1985), Main Economic Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
O'Higgins, M. (1983), ‘Rolling back the welfare state: the rhetoric and reality of public expenditure under the Conservative government’ in Jones, C. and Stevenson, J. (eds) The Yearbook of Social Policy in Britain, 1982. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Peltzman, S. (1980), ‘The growth of government’, Journal of Law and Economics, 23, 209287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pliatzky, L. (1984), Getting and Spending, revised edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. (1986), ‘Restructuring the welfare state: an analysis of public expenditure, 1979/1980 1984/5’, Journal of Social Policy 15, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. (1986), ‘Choice and inertia as alternatives for revenue change’. Paper presented to the International Institute of Public Finance 42nd Congress, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Karran, T. (forthcoming), Taxation by Inertia: Financing the Growth of Government in Britain. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1985) (ed), ‘Nobel symposium on the growth of government’, Journal of Public Economics 28, 273399.Google Scholar
Smith, R. P. (1980), ‘The demand for military expenditure’, Economic Journal 90, 811821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SS (1984), Social Security Statistics. London: HMSO, DHSS.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Bochel, M. (1986), ‘Middle class interests and welfare cuts’, University of Kent: unpublished.Google Scholar
Victor, C. R. and Evandrou, M. (1986), ‘Social class and the elderly: analysis of the 1980 GHS’. Paper presented at the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Loughborough, March.Google Scholar
White, H. (1980), ‘A heteroskedasticity-consistsent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test of heteroskedasticity’, Econometrica 48, 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J. R. M. and Hardwick, P.J. W. (1978), Tax Expenditures in the United Kingdom, Institute for Fiscal Studies. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar