Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T04:00:49.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Forensic phonetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Francis Nolan
Francis Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge CB3 9DA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , September 1991 , pp. 483 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baldwin, J. (1979). Phonetics and speaker identification. Medicine, Science and the Law 19. 231–232.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. & French, P. (1990). Forensic phonetics. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Carlson, R., Fant, G. & Granström, B. (1975). Two-formant models, pitch and vowel perception. In Fant, G. & Tatham, M. A. A. (eds) Auditory analysis and perception of speech. London: Academic Press. 55–82.Google Scholar
Künzel, H. J. (1987). Sprechererkennung. Heidelberg: Kriminalistik Verlag.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1983). The phonetic bases of speaker recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1990). The limitations of auditory-phonetic speaker identification. In Kniffka, H. (ed.) Texte zu Theorie und Praxis forensischer Linguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 457–479.Google Scholar
Repp, B. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 92. 81–110.Google Scholar
Shirt, M. (1984). An auditory speaker recognition experiment. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics 6(1). 101–104.Google Scholar