Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:40:25.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Backlash in American Politics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2008

Kira Sanbonmatsu
Kira Sanbonmatsu
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this essay, I start to sketch a research agenda about an electoral backlash against women's descriptive representation. Few scholars have considered the possibility of such a backlash. By “backlash,” I mean resistance to attempts to change the status quo. As Jane Mansbridge and Shauna Shames argue in this issue, when actors disadvantaged by the status quo work to enact change, they may be met by a reaction by those seeking to maintain existing power arrangements. In the following pages, I introduce the idea of a backlash against women's representation, propose several preliminary hypotheses about a backlash, and discuss ways of testing them.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 634 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bratton, Kathleen A. 2002. “The Effect of Legislative Diversity on Agenda-Setting: Evidence from Six State Legislatures.” American Politics Research 30 (2): 115–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Breaking the Glass Ceiling: A Woman Presidential Candidate CBS News Poll.” 2008. Press Release. June 3. http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/May08b-Woman.pdf (July 3, 2008).Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. 2d ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
CAWP (Center for American Women, and Politics). 2008a. “History of Women Governors.” Fact sheet. National Information Bank on Women in Public Office, Eagleton Institute of Politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
CAWP (Center for American Women, and Politics). 2008b. “Women in Elective Office 2008.” Fact sheet. National Information Bank on Women in Public Office, Eagleton Institute of Politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2004. “When Tokens Matter.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (1): 109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, R., Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2d ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. Forthcoming. “Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Gender Balance in Government.” American Politics Research.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Diekman, Amanda B.. 2005. “What Is the Problem? Prejudice as an Attitude-in-Context.” In On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years after Allport, ed. Dovidio, John F., Glick, Peter, and Rudman, Laurie A.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., Makhijani, Mona G., and Klonsky, Bruce G.. 1992. “Gender and the Evaluation of Leaders: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 111 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 2003. “Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success.” Journal of Politics 65 (3): 833–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Jo. 1987. “Whom You Know versus Whom You Represent: Feminist Influence in the Democratic and Republican Parties.” In The Women's Movements of the United States and Western Europe: Consciousness, Political Opportunity, and Public Policy, ed. Fainsod Katzenstein, Mary and Mueller, Carol McClurg. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 215–44.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P. 2007. “Representation and Backlash: The Positive and Negative Influence of Descriptive Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (February): 107–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M., and Paxton, Pamela. 2007. “Familiar Theories from a New Perspective: The Implications of a Longitudinal Approach to Women in Politics Research.” Politics & Gender 3 (September): 370–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman: How Stereotypes Influence the Conduct and Consequences of Political Campaigns. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977a. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977b. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review 88 (September): 560–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatch, Rebecca. 1987. Women of the New Right. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine M. 2007. “Seeing Gender over the Short and Long Haul.” Politics & Gender 3 (September): 378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2005. “Change in Continuity in the Geography of Women State Legislators.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 176–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. 2d ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rudman, Laurie A. 1998. “Self-promotion as a Risk Factor for Women: The Costs and Benefits of Counterstereotypical Impression Management.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 (3): 629–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudman, Laurie A., and Fairchild, Kimberly. 2004. “Reactions to Counterstereotypic Behavior: The Role of Backlash in Cultural Stereotype Maintenance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (2): 157–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women's Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2008. Righting Feminism: Conservative Women and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, Richard A., Newman, Jody, and Leighton, Melissa Vorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates & Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smooth, Wendy G. 2001. African American Women State Legislators: The Impact of Gender and Race on Legislative Influence. Ph.D. diss. University of Maryland at College Park.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen M., and Matthews, Glenna. 1994. Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yoder, Janice D. 1991. “Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers.” Gender & Society 5 (June): 178–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar