Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:25:12.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is there a comprehension problem for children who speak nonstandard English? A study of children with Hawaiian-English backgrounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Gisela E. Speidel ,
Roland G. Tharp  and
Linda Kobayashi
Gisela E. Speidel*
Affiliation:
Center for Development of Early Education and University of Hawaii
Roland G. Tharp
Affiliation:
Center for Development of Early Education and University of Hawaii
Linda Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Center for Development of Early Education
*
Gisela E. Speidel, Language and Learning Department, Center for Development of Early Education, 1850 Makuakane Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Students speaking Hawaiian-English may have difficulty understanding the information presented in the classroom and thereby have less success at school. Children from standard English-speaking backgrounds and from Hawaiian-English-speaking backgrounds were randomly assigned to one of six listening conditions. The conditions consisted of the same selections, but the selections were either in standard English, standard English with Hawaiian pronunciation, or Hawaiian-English. Each of these three versions, in turn, had a simple or a complex syntax version. The semantic content remained constant over all conditions. There was no difference between Hawaiian-English and standard English groups when all comprehension conditions were considered, indicating that the two groups of children did not differ in comprehension ability. However, Hawaiian-English children gave more correct answers when the selections were in their dialect than in standard, while standard English children tended to give more correct answers when the selections were in standard rather than in Hawaiian-English. Contrary to expectations, use of simple syntax and use of Hawaiian-English pronunciation did not facilitate comprehension of standard English by Hawaiian-English children. Implications for educational accommodations will be discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 83 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ammon, U. (1977). School problems of regional dialect speakers: Ideology and reality. Results and methods of empirical investigations in southern Germany. Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ammon, U.Ann Arbor Decision: Memorandum Opinion and Order and the Educational Plan. (1979). Arlington, VA: The Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bannatyne, A. (1971). Language, reading and learning disabilities. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 74, 506–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., Omanson, R. C., & Pople, M. T. (1983). Rewriting stories to improve their comprehensibility. Paper presented at the annual convention of AERA, Montreal.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D., & Odo, C. (1976–1977). Change and variation in Hawaiian English, 1(3). Final report on National Science Foundation Grant No. GS–39748. University of Hawaii: Social Sciences and Linguistics Institute, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Botel, M. & Granowsky, A. (1972). A formula for measuring syntactic complexity: A directional effort. Elementary English, 49, 513–16.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1972). Defining language comprehension: Some speculations. In Freedle, R. O. & Carroll, J. B. (Eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. New York: Houghton.Google Scholar
Choy, S. J., & Dodd, D. H. (1976). Standard English-speaking and nonstandard Hawaiian-English speaking children. Comprehension of both dialects and teacher's evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 184–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, M. F. (1980). Developmental components of reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 656–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, R. R. (1972). Patterns of variation in copula and tense in the Hawaiian post-Creole continuum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Day, R. R., Boggs, S. T., Tharp, R. G., Gallimore, R., & Speidel, G. E. (1974). A Standard English performance measure for young children: The Standard English Repetition Test (SERT). Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 73–85. Honolulu: Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. G. (1976). The prediction and explanation of academic achievement (Tech. Rept. No. 54). Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Kamehameha Early Education Program.Google Scholar
Hagen, A., Vallen, A., & Stijnen, P. (1975). De problemtik van dialek sprekende kinderen, verkend in let anderwijs in Kerkrade. Medelingen van de Nijmeegse centrale voor-Dialekt-en Naamkunde, 14, 1–24.Google Scholar
Hall, V. C., & Turner, R. (1974). The validity of the “different language explanation” for poor scholastic performance by black students. Review of Educational Research, 44, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, W. A., & Crabbs, L. M. (1961). McCall-Crabbs Standard Test Lessons in Reading. New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Smith, K. J., Truby, H., Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1977). The KEEP phone discrimination test (Tech. Report 64). Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Kamehameha Early Education Program.Google Scholar
Speidel, G. E. (1979). The relationship between psycholinguistic abilities and reading achievement in dialect-speaking children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Speidel, G. E. (1981). Language and reading: Bridging the language difference for children who speak Hawaiian English. Educational Perspectives, 20(1), 23–30.Google Scholar
Speidel, G. E. (1982). Responding to language differences. In Oral language in a successful reading program for Hawaiian children (Tech. Rept. No. 105). Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Kamehameha Early Education Program.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. (1982). (Discussant). In Speidel, G. E., Gallimore, R., Jordan, C., Dowhower-Vuyk, S., Baird-Vogt, L., & Tucker, G. (Eds.), Oral language in a successful reading program for Hawaiian children. (Tech. Rept. 105). Honolulu: Kamehameha Schools, Kamehameha Early Education Program.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (1982). Verbal processing in poor and normal readers. In Brainerd, C. J. & Pressley, M. (Eds.), Verbal processes in children: Progress in cognitive development research. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W., Potter, L., Yanofsky, N. M., & Shuy, R. (1979). Reading and dialect difference. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar