Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T05:29:37.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coping With Dementia: Evaluation of Four Nonpharmacologic Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Mary P. Quayhagen
Affiliation:
University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Margaret Quayhagen
Affiliation:
University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Robert R. Corbeil
Affiliation:
University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Ronald C. Hendrix
Affiliation:
Alzheimer's Association of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
J. Edward Jackson
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
Lisa Snyder
Affiliation:
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Doris Bower
Affiliation:
Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

Abstract

To evaluate nonpharmacologic interventions, caregivers (65 women, 38 men) and their dementia-diagnosed spouses (patients) were randomized to one of four treatment programs (cognitive stimulation, dyadic counseling, dual supportive seminar, and early-stage day care) or to a wait-list control group. Assessments occurred initially and at postintervention (3 months). Patients were evaluated on memory, verbal fluency, and problem-solving ability, and caregivers were assessed on marital interaction, emotional status, and physical health, along with stress, coping, and social support. Caregivers also completed a program evaluation. Repeated measures procedures showed that patients in the cognitive stimulation group demonstrated more improvement over time in cognitive outcomes, and caregivers decreased in depressive symptoms. Early-stage day-care and dual supportive seminar group caregivers reported a decrease in hostility and a decrease in use of negative coping strategies, respectively. Although qualitatively derived benefits differed across groups, similarities in program content reduced the potential for quantitative differentiation among the groups.

Type
Dementia
Copyright
© 2000 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)