Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:34:28.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On some recent claims in phonological theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

F. W. Householder Jr
F. W. Householder Jr
Affiliation:
Linguistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1962, on the occasion of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, an article by Morris Halle (1962) appeared in the special issue of Word, and Noam Chomsky (1964) appeared before a plenary session of the Congress to defend some remarks which had previously been distributed in the Preprints.1 These two papers were perhaps intended as a sort of one-two punch to knock old-fashioned linguistics out of the ring; at any rate, on matters of phonology, their claims and assertions, if all wholly true, would tend to make all phonological work impossible on any known lines (curiously, they fail to reveal their own methods).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , April 1965 , pp. 13 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chew, G. F., Gell Mann, M., and Rosenfeld, A. H. (1964). Strongly interacting particles. Scientific American, 02 1964. 74–93.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. (Janua Linguarum, No. 4.) ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). The logical basis of linguistic theory. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton 914–1008.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1962). Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72.Google Scholar
Hiorth, F. (1963). Hypostasis. Lingua 13. 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1947). Descriptive analysis of Latin declension, Word 3. 48–58.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1952). Review of Harris's Methods in Structural Linguistics. IJAL 18. 260–268.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1961). On linguistic terms. In Psycholinguistics, A Book of Readings. Edited by Saporta, Sol, 15–25. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Householder, F. W. (1962). On the uniqueness of semantic mapping. Word 18. 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackowski, P. (1963). Words as grammatical primes. Language 39. 211–215.Google Scholar
Mel'chuk, I. A. (1963). On the standard form and quantitative characteristics of several linguistic descriptions. Foreign Developments in Machine Translation and Information Processing. No. 120. Translated from Voprosy Jazykomutnija No. 1, 1963, 113–123. This translation is available from the Superintendent of Documenta, U.S. G.P.O., Washington 25, D.C.Google Scholar
Miller, G. E. (1956). The perception of speech. For Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton. 353–359.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar