Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-24hb2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T09:34:21.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kant and religion: conflict or compromise?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

CHRIS L. FIRESTONE
Affiliation:
New College, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH2 2LX, Scotland

Abstract

The standard reading of Kant presumes that ‘the moral hypothesis’ is a necessary and sufficient condition for understanding his philosophy of religion. This paper opens with the assumption – taken from one of Kant's last works – that philosophy and theology must always remain in conflict. Then, by way of an abductive comparison of the positions of Ronald M. Green and John Hick, I demonstrate that the moral hypothesis leads to religious compromises that contradict this assumption. To conclude, I argue that the motif of transformation is syptomatic of the underlying problem and suggest that it be replaced by the motif of transition.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)