Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T09:32:08.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethics and aesthetics: the social theory of barbershop harmony

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

Extract

Until recently, the world of the British barbershop singer was a self-enclosed community whose existence went largely unrecognised both by musicians involved in other genres and by the public at large. In the last few years this has started to change, chiefly due to the participation of barbershop choruses in the televised competition ‘Sainsbury's Choir of the Year’. Encouraged by the success of Shannon Express in 1994, many other choruses entered the 1996 competition, four of them reaching the televised semi-finals, and two the finals. During this increased exposure, it became apparent that television commentators had little idea of what to make of barbershoppers, indeed regarded them as a peculiar, and perhaps rather trivial, breed of performer. This bafflement is not surprising given the genre's relative paucity of exposure either in the mass media or in the musical and musicological press; the plentiful articles written by barbershoppers about their activity and its meanings are almost exclusively addressed to each other, to sustain the community rather than integrate it into wider musical life. The purpose of this paper, however, is not to follow the theme of these intra-community articles in arguing that barbershop harmony should actually be regarded as a serious and worthy art, or to explain to a bewildered world what this genre is actually about; rather, it aims to explore the way that barbershop singers theorise themselves and their activity to provide a case study in the relationship between social and musical values. That is, I am not writing as an apologist for a hitherto distinctly insular practice, but exploiting that very insularity as a means to pursue a potentially very broad question within a self-limited field of enquiry.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, L. 1992. ‘Play that barbershop chord: a case for the African-Americans origin of barbershop harmony’, American Music, 10(3), pp. 289325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amos, D. 1989. ‘Life president's message’, Harmony Express, 11, p. 1Google Scholar
Ayling, T. 1996. ‘Around the clubs: Portsmouth’, Singout, 07/08, p. 7Google Scholar
BABS Directory. 1996. BABSGoogle Scholar
Beck, J. 1982. The Napkin Method: Basic Barbershop Arranging Manual (Crawley)Google Scholar
Cox, W. 1997. Letter to the editor, Harmony Express, 04, p. 6Google Scholar
Denny, J. 1960. The Oxford School Harmony Course, Book I (London)Google Scholar
Francis, P. 1996. ‘Club news: Greater Manchester’, Harmony Express, 12, p. 10Google Scholar
Garnett, E.A. 1995. ‘Constructions of gender and musical style, 1790–1830’ Ph.D. dissertation, University of SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Garnett, E.A. 1996. ‘Problems in the gendered analysis of instrumental music: drama, narrativity, personae’, presented at the Gender Theory Analysis Conference, Puy de Bost, FranceGoogle Scholar
Hagerman, B. and Sundberg, J. 1980. ‘Fundamental frequency adjustment in barbershop singing’, Journal of Research in Singing, 4, pp. 312Google Scholar
Hill, C.C. 1986. ‘Consonance and dissonance’, in The New Harvard Dictionary of Music, ed. Randall, Don (Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
Holland, G. 1996. ‘What we have to offer the a cappella world is without precedent’, Harmony Express, 01/02, p. 7Google Scholar
‘Jenny Barbershopper writes …’ 1996. Singout, 05/06, p. 8Google Scholar
Jones, G.T. 1974. Music Theory (New York)Google Scholar
Kaplan, M. (ed.) 1993. Barbershopping: Musical and Social Harmony (London and Toronto)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, J.H. 1990. ‘Ideology’, in Critical Terms for Literary Study, eds. Lentricchia, F. and McLaughlin, T. (Chicago and London)Google Scholar
Kitson, C.H. 1920. Elementary Harmony, Part I (Oxford)Google Scholar
LABBS. 1996. Contest and Judging Handbook, LABBS Music & Judging CommitteeGoogle Scholar
Miles, S.A. 1995. ‘Critics of disenchantment’, Notes, 51(1), pp. 1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R.O. 1958. Foundations of Practical Harmony and Counterpoint (London)Google Scholar
Obituaries: Reg Brooker, Guildford BHC and Reading BHC’. 1997. Harmony Express, 05, p. 5Google Scholar
Ottmann, R.W. 1970. Elementary Harmony: Theory and Practice (New Jersey)Google Scholar
Piston, W. 1941/1987. Harmony, revised by Mark Devoto (London)Google Scholar
Pooley, A. 1997. Letter to the editor, HE, 07, p.7Google Scholar
Schoenberg, A. 1941/1975. ‘Composition with twelve tones’, in Style and Idea: Selected Writings of Arnold Schoenberg, ed. Stein, L. (London) pp. 214–45Google Scholar
Searle, T. 1997. ‘From the Director of Music Services’. Harmony Express, 03, p. 10Google Scholar
Sessions, R. 1951. Harmonic Practice (New York)Google Scholar
SPEBSQSA, Inc. 1980. Barbershop Arranging Manual (Kenosha, WI)Google Scholar
Stebbins, R.A. 1996. The Barber Shop Singer: Inside the Social World of a Musical Hobby (Toronto)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, D. 1983. ‘What are we trying to preserve?’, Key-note address to SPEBSQSA Harmony College (issued on video 1983) (Kenosha, WI)Google Scholar
Szabo, B. 1976. Theory of Barbershop Harmony (Kenosha, WI)Google Scholar