Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T07:20:19.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘I fought the law’: popular music and British obscenity law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2008

Martin Cloonan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In Britain the term ‘obscenity’ has enjoyed a chequered career. Obscene libel first became an offence in 1727 when an erotic book called Venus in the Cloister was found to contravene common law by tending to ‘weaken the bonds of civil society, virtue and morality’ (Robertson 1991, p. 180). Despite this, erotic literature remained freely available throughout the eighteenth century. In the nineteenth century Britain got its first Obscene Publications Act. This came in 1857 and gave the police power to take books before local Justices who could order their forfeiture and destruction.

Type
Articles
Information
Popular Music , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , October 1995 , pp. 349 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Cloonan, M. 1993. 'Banned! Censorship of popular music in Britain: 1967–1992, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Denselow, R. 1989. When The Music's Over (London)Google Scholar
Frith, S. 1988. ‘Copyright and the music business’, Popular Music, 7/1, pp. 57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffe, L. 1989. ‘An attitude problem in LA’, The Guardian, 19 10, p. 27Google Scholar
Halassa, M. 1990. ‘Biting off more than they can chew’, The Guardian, 22 11, p. 30Google Scholar
Heller, Z. 1992. ‘Teenage monsters’, Independent, 6 09, pp. 2–4Google Scholar
Longrigg, C. 1991. ‘Singled out for abuse’, Independent, 8 08, p. 17Google Scholar
Marot, M. 1991. ‘Censorship rang’, Vox, 11, p. 65Google Scholar
Pattison, R. 1987. The Triumph of Vulgarity (Oxford)Google Scholar
Robertson, G. 1991. Freedom, the Individual and The Law (London)Google Scholar
Savage, J. 1990. ‘And the banned played on’, Observer, 11 11, p. 26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, J. 1991. England's Dreaming (London)Google Scholar
Spence, P. 1988. ‘Harmony in my headache’, NME, 16 07, pp. 12–14Google Scholar
Stallings, P. 1984. Rock 'n' Roll Confidential (London)Google Scholar
Street, J. 1986. Rebel Rock (Oxford)Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. 1982. Offensive Literature (London)Google Scholar
Toop, D. 1991. ‘America's most wanted’, Sunday Times, 24 11, pp. 68–87Google Scholar
Troitsky, A. 1987. Back in the USSR (London)Google Scholar
Wells, S. 1990. ‘Censors working overtime’, NME, 11 08, pp. 18–19Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. 1982. A Most Dangerous Woman? (Tring)Google Scholar
Wood, L. 1988. The Sex Pistols Day By Day (London)Google Scholar

Additional reading

Cloonan, M. 1992. ‘Censorship and popular music: an initial attempt at identification’, Occasional Paper No. 1, University of LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
Committee on Obscenity and Film Censorship. 1979. Report (London)Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. 1990. ‘Sharpening the blue pencil’, New Statesman and Society, 8 05, p. 46Google Scholar
Martin, L. and Segrave, K. 1988. Anti-Rock (Hampden, Connecticut)Google Scholar
National Viewers and Listeners Association. 1990. Obscene Publications Act: The Need for a New Act (Colchester)Google Scholar
Palmer, T. 1971. The Trials of Oz (Manchester)Google Scholar
Robertson, G. and Nicol, A. 1984. Media Law (London)Google Scholar
Romney, J. 1987. ‘They fought the law … and their lawyers won’, NME, 21 11, p. 7Google Scholar
Toop, D. 1991. ‘Taking the rap for their rhymes’, The Times, 17 12, p. 12Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. 1985. Mightier Than The Sword (Eastbourne)Google Scholar
Zappa, F. 1989. The Real Frank Zappa Book (London)Google Scholar