Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:22:07.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Fundamentals, the Polls, and the Presidential Vote

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

Christopher Wlezien  and
Robert S. Erikson
Christopher Wlezien
Affiliation:
Oxford University
Robert S. Erikson
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As the experience of 2000 shows, forecasting presidential elections is an inexact science. Everybody knows that “the economy” matters, but simple projection from economic conditions at the time of the forecast is not enough. And the most important economic shocks to the economy are the late shocks, which may arrive too late to be measured by the forecaster. Other events also impact, such as (in 2004) the Iraq war. Incorporating presidential approval into the model helps to control for “other” events that economic indicators ignore, but obviously only those that are observable by the time of the latest approval reading. They also don't reveal much about voters' comparative judgments of the two candidates. Of course one can forecast the presidential race from trial-heat polls available at the moment rather than trying to capture the fundamentals that will matter on Election Day. But the whole purpose of forecasting is to present information about the voters' future behavior that is not yet evident in the trialheat polls. Besides, early polls only tell us little about the final election outcome.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 747 - 751
Copyright
© 2004 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz Alan I. 1988. “An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Outcomes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21: 843– 847.Google Scholar
Beck Nathaniel. 2000. “Evaluating Forecasts and Forecasting Models of the 1996 Presidential Election.” In Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections, eds., James E. Campbell and James C. Garand. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Brody Richard, and Lee Sigelman. 1983. “Presidential Popularity and Presidential Elections: An Update and Extension.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47: 325– 328.Google Scholar
Brown Lloyd B., and Henry W. Chappell Jr. 1999. “Forecasting Using History and the Polls.” International Journal of Forecasting 15: 127– 135.Google Scholar
Campbell James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell James E. 1996. “Polls and Votes: The Trial Heat Presidential Election Forecasting Model, Uncertainty, and Political Campaigns.” American Politics Quarterly 24: 408– 433.Google Scholar
Campbell James E., and James C. Garand, eds. 2000. Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Erikson Robert S., and Christopher Wlezien. 1994. “Forecasting the Presidential Vote, 1992.” The Political Methodologist 5: 10– 11.Google Scholar
Erikson Robert S., and Christopher Wlezien. 1996. “Of Time and Presidential Election Forecasts.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29: 37– 39.Google Scholar
Hibbs Douglas A., Jr. 1987. The American Political Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holbrook Thomas. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rogers R. Mark. 1994. Handbook of Key Economic Indicators. New York: Richard Irwin.Google Scholar
Wlezien Christopher. 2001. “On Forecasting the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34: 29– 35.Google Scholar
Wlezien Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson. 1996. “Temporal Horizons and Presidential Election Forecasts.” American Politics Quarterly 24: 49– 50.Google Scholar
Wlezien Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson. 2002. “The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 64: 969– 993.Google Scholar
Zaller John. 2004. “Floating Voters in US Presidential Elections, 1948–2000. In The Issue of Belief: Essays in the Intersection of Non-Attitudes and Attitude Change, eds., Paul Sniderman and Willem Saris. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar