Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T23:35:59.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Time-Compressed Speech on Native and Efl Listening Comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Linda Conrad
Linda Conrad
Affiliation:
Akademie für Lehrerfortbildung Dillingen, West Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The experiment reported here used time-compressed speech to handicap the process of listening comprehension in an attempt to observe aural processing strategy differences among groups of native English speakers and high- and medium-level skill groups learning the language. The participants were asked to immediately recall 5 time-compressed recordings each of 16 simple English sentences; the 5 replays represented decreasing rates of time-compression ranging from 40% to 90% normal playing time. Group performances were compared for the 5 rates of compression with regard to overall sentence recall as well as to the recall of specific parts of speech. Results showed both quantitative and qualitative differences among the three test groups. Overall recall of the time-compressed sentences decreased with decreasing proficiency in the language. Furthermore, whereas native listeners demonstrated a strategy of concentrating on key content words in the stimulus, both learner groups tended to recall more words they had heard in initial or final sentence position.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aaronson, D., Markowitz, N., & Shapiro, H. (1971). Perception and immediate recall of normal and “compressed” auditory sequences. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. A. (1977). Neural models with cognitive implications. In Berge, D. La & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 27–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Beatty, M., Behnke, R., & Goodyear, F. H. (1979). Effects of speeded speech presentations on confidence-weighted and traditional comprehension scores. Communication Monographs, 46, 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Call, M. E. (1985). Auditory short-term memory, listening comprehension, and the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29, 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1975). Strategies in the comprehension of relative clauses. Language and Speech, 18, 204–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, V. J. (1977). Cognitive processes in second language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cziko, G. A. (1980). Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first-and second-language oral reading errors. Language Learning, 30, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, J. (1979, March). Developmental patterns in native and non-native reading acquisition. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual TESOL Convention, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Fishier, I., & Goodman, R. (1978). Semantic and episodic constraints on the use of surface-order cues in the comprehension of locative sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 121–134.Google Scholar
Flores d'Arcais, G. B., & Schreuder, R. (1983). The process of language understanding. In Flores d'Arcais, G. B. & Jarvella, R. J. (Eds.), The process of language understanding (pp. 1–41). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Forster, K. I. (1970). Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gat, I., & Keith, R. W. (1978). An effect of linguistic experience on auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English. Audiology, 17, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gradman, H., & Spolsky, B. (1975). Reduced redundancy testing: A process report. In Jones, R. & Spolsky, B. (Eds.), Testing language proficiency (pp. 59–66). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hatch, E., Polin, P., & Part, S. (1979). Acoustic scanning or syntactic processing. Paper presented at meeting of the Western Psychological Association,San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Henrichsen, L. (1984). Sandhi-variation: A filter of input for learners of ESL. Language Learning, 34, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvella, R. J. (1971). Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1980). The input hypothesis. In Alatis, J. E. (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (pp. 168–180). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, B.. & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Restructuring or automaticity? Reading in a second language. Language Learning, 36, 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehler, J., Segui, J., Pittet, M., & Barrière, M. (1978). Strategies for sentence perception. Journal of Psychohnguistic Research, 7, 3–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mistler-Lachman, J. L. (1974). Depth of comprehension and sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C, & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar
Wingfield, A., & Nolan, K. (1980). Spontaneous segmentation in normal and in time-compressed speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed