Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T01:39:14.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of four serological tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease in a Colombian endemic area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2004

R. GUTIERREZ ,
V. M. ANGULO ,
Z. TARAZONA ,
C. BRITTO  and
O. FERNANDES
R. GUTIERREZ
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Km 2 Vía El Refugio-Piedecuesta, Santander, A.A. 678 Bucaramanga, Colombia
V. M. ANGULO
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Km 2 Vía El Refugio-Piedecuesta, Santander, A.A. 678 Bucaramanga, Colombia
Z. TARAZONA
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Km 2 Vía El Refugio-Piedecuesta, Santander, A.A. 678 Bucaramanga, Colombia
C. BRITTO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Tropical e Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, 21045-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
O. FERNANDES
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Tropical e Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, 21045-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The performance of 4 serological tests for the diagnosis of Chagas disease was evaluated in Santander, Colombia, a region still presenting active transmission. Serum samples from 638 individuals were submitted to an enzyme immunoassay test (EIA), using total lysate of a local Trypanosoma cruzi strain and 52·5% were positive (335/638). A subset of this group (94 positive individuals and 90 seronegatives) was randomly selected for further serological confirmation. Three additional tests were used – indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and 2 distinct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using total lysate of the Y strain (EIA BM) and a mixture of 2 recombinant antigens (EIA RA). Seventy-nine patients were seropositive in all tests (84·0% – 79/94). The number of positive sera with the IIF, EIA RA and EIA BM was 84/94 (89·4%), 80/94 (85·1%) and 79/94 (84·0%), respectively. In 15 out of the 94 EIA seropositive patients (16·0%), 10 individuals were negative in all 3 tests (10·6% – 10/94). One was negative in the EIA BM and positive in the other two tests (1·1% – 1/94) and 4 patients were positive, solely, in the IIF assay (4·3% – 4/94). Relative to the 90 EIA negative individuals, 89 were confirmed in all other tests (98·9% – 89/90). One individual, although seronegative in the IIF, was positive in both confirmatory EIA tests (1·1% – 1/90). In addition, 120 blood specimens were submitted to PCR amplification. This group consisted of 79 confirmed seropositive cases, 16 individuals with discordant serological results and 25 validated seronegative individuals. The PCR was able to detect the presence of parasite DNA in 67 out of the 79 seropositive patients (84·8%), in 8 individuals with discordant serology (50·0%) and in only one seronegative individual (4·0%). The results pointed to the necessity for performing more than one serological test, preferentially with antigens from autochthonous strains, to achieve a reliable diagnosis of Chagas disease in Colombia.

Keywords

indirect immunofluorescenceChagas diseaseserologyenzyme immunoassayPCRTrypanosoma cruzi
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 129 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 439 - 444
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ALMEIDA, E., KRIEGER, M. A., CARVALHO, M. R., OELEMANN, W. & GOLDENBERG, S. (1990). Use of recombinant antigens for the diagnosis of Chagas disease and blood bank screening. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 85, 513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDRADE, S. G., ANDRADE, V., ROCHA FILHO, F. D. & BARRAL NETTO, M. B. (1981). Antigenic analysis of various strains of Trypanosoma cruzi. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 23, 245–250.Google Scholar
ANGULO, V. M., MUÑOZ, G. & TARAZONA, Z. (1993 a). Factores de riesgo de la vivienda para infestación domiciliaria por triatominos. Biomedica 12 (Suppl.), S124–S125.Google Scholar
ANGULO, V. M., MUÑOZ, G., GÓMEZ, G., OCASIONES, R. E., GONZÁLES, C. I., PABA, J. & CHÁVEZ, A. M. (1993 b). Estudio epidemiologico y clinico de um foco de transmision de Trypanosoma cruzi em Santander. Biomedica 12 (Suppl.), S132.Google Scholar
ANGULO, V. M., ARISMENDI, M. J., JOYA, M. I., SANDOVAL, C. M. & GUTIÉRREZ, R. (1997). Infección natural por tripanosomatidos en triatomíneos (Hemiptera reduviidae) domiciliados en cinco municipios de Santander. Biomedica 17 (Suppl.), S161–S162.Google Scholar
AVILA, H. A., SIGMAN, D. S., COHEN, L. M., MILLIKAN, R. C. & SIMPSON, L. (1991). Polymerase chain reaction amplification of Trypanosoma cruzi kinetoplast minicircle DNA isolated from whole blood lysates: diagnosis of chronic Chagas' disease. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 48, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRENER, Z. & KRETTLI, A. U. (1990). Immunology of Chagas' disease. In Modern Parasite Biology: Cellular, Immunologic and Molecular Aspects (ed. Wyler, D. J.), pp. 247–261. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
BRITTO, C., CARDOSO, M. A., WINCKER, P. & MOREL, C. M. (1993). A simple protocol for the physical cleavage of Trypanosoma cruzi kinetoplast DNA present in blood samples and its use in polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 88, 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUSCAGLIA, C. A. & DI NOIA, J. M. (2003). Trypanosoma cruzi clonal diversity and the epidemiology of Chagas' disease. Microbes and Infection 5, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAMARGO, M. E. (1992). An appraisal of Chagas' disease serodiagnosis. In Chagas' disease (American Trypanosomiasis): its Impact on Transfusion and Clinical Medicine (ed. ISBT Brazil 1992), pp. 165–178. ISBT, São Paulo.
CARVALHO, M. R., KRIEGER, M. A., ALMEIDA, E., OELEMANN, W., SHIKANAI-YASSUDA, M. A., FERREIRA, A. W., BORGES-PEREIRA, J., SÁEZ-ALQUÉZAR, A., DORLHIAC-LLACER, P. E., CHAMONE, D. F. & GOLDENBERG, S. (1993). Chagas' disease diagnosis: evaluation of several tests in blood bank screening. Transfusion 33, 830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COURA, J. R., JUNQUEIRA, A. C., BOIA, M. N., FERNANDES, O., BONFANTE, C., CAMPOS, J. E., SANTOS, L. & DEVERA, R. (2002). Chagas disease in the Brazilian Amazon: a new cross-sectional study. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo 44, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CUERVO, P., CUPOLILLO, E., SEGURA, I., SARAVIA, N. & FERNANDES, O. (2002). Genetic diversity of colombian sylvatic Trypanosoma cruzi isolates revealed by the ribosomal DNA. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 97, 877–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DI NOIA, J. M., BUSCAGLIA, C. A., DE MARCHI, C. R., ALMEIDA, I. C. & FRASCH, A. C. C. (2002). A Trypanosoma cruzi small surface molecule provides the first immunological evidence that Chagas' disease is due to a single parasite lineage. Journal of Experimental Medicine 195, 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOMES, Y. M., PEREIRA, R. A. V., NAKAZAWA, M., ROSA, S. D., BARROS, D. S. M. N., FERREIRA, G. P. A., SILVA, D. E., OGATTA, Y. F. S., KRIEGER, M. A. & GOLDENBERG, S. (2001). Serodiagnosis of chronic Chagas infection by using EIE-recombinant-Chagas-Biomanguinhos kit. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 96, 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUHL, F. (1999). Estado actual del control de la enfermedad de Chagas en Colombia. Medicina Buenos Aires 59 (Suppl.), S103–S116.Google Scholar
GUHL, F., HUDSON, L., MARINKELLE, C. J., MORGAN, S. J. & JARAMILLO, C. A. (1985). Antibody response to experimental Trypanosoma rangeli infection and its implication for the immunodiagnosis of South American trypanosomiasis. Acta Tropica 42, 311–318.Google Scholar
GUHL, F., HUDSON, L., MARINKELLE, C. J., JARAMILLO, C. A. & BRIDGE, D. (1987). Clinical Trypanosoma rangeli infection as a complication of Chagas' disease. Parasitology 94, 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KRIEGER, M. A., ALMEIDA, E., OELEMANN, W., LAFAILLE, J. J., PEREIRA, J. B., CARVALHO, M. R. & GOLDENBERG, S. (1992). Use of recombinant antigens for the accurate immunodiagnosis of Chagas' disease. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 46, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAFAILLE, J. J., LINSS, J., KRIEGER, M. A., SOUTO-PADRON, T., DE SOUZA, W. & GOLDENBERG, S. (1989). Structure and expression of two Trypanosoma cruzi genes encoding antigenic proteins bearing repetitive epitopes. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 35, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MONCAYO, A. (1997). Progress towards the elimination of transmission of Chagas disease in Latin America. World Health Statistical Quarter 50, 195–198.Google Scholar
MONCAYO, A. & LUQUETTI, A. O. (1990). Multicentre double blind study for evaluation of Trypanosoma cruzi defined antigens as diagnostic reagents. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 85, 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAIKI, R. K., SCHARF, S., FALOONA, F., MULLIS, K. B., HORN, G. T., ERLICH, H. A. & ARNHEIM, N. (1985). Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230, 1350–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALDAÑA, A. & SOUSA, O. E. (1996). Trypanosoma rangeli and Trypanosoma cruzi: cross-reaction among their immunogenic components. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 91, 81–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHMUÑIS, G. A. (1991). Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas' disease: status in the blood supply in endemic and non-endemic countries. Transfusion 31, 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STURM, N. R., DEGRAVE, W., MOREL, C. M. & SIMPSON, L. (1989). Sensitive detection and schizodeme classification of Trypanosoma cruzi cells by amplification of kinetoplast minicircle DNA sequences: use in diagnosis of Chagas' disease. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 33, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VOLLER, A., DRAPER, C., BIDWELL, D. E. & BARTLETT, A. (1975). Microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for Chagas' disease. Lancet 1, 426–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WINCKER, P., BRITTO, C., BORGES-PEREIRA, J., CARDOSO, M. A., OELEMANN, W. & MOREL, C. M. (1994). Use of a simplified polymerase chain reaction procedure to detect Trypanosoma cruzi in blood samples from chronic chagasic patients in a rural endemic area. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 51, 771–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WINCKER, P., TELLERIA, J., BOSSENO, M. F., CARDOSO, M. A., MARQUES, P., YAKSIC, N., AZNAR, C., LIEGEARD, P., HONTEBEYRIE, M., NOIREAU, F., MOREL, C. M. & BRENIERE, S. F. (1997). PCR-based diagnosis for Chagas' disease in Bolivian children living in an active transmission area: comparison with conventional serological and parasitological diagnosis. Parasitology 114, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (1996). Control of Tropical Disease. Chagas' Disease. A Disease Whose Days are Numbered. World Health Organization, Geneva.