Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T16:43:56.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Values and Social Policy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Paul Wilding  and
Vic George
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social values are clearly an important influence on the development and administration of social policies. In discussions about social values, however, different political groupings use the same words but with different meanings. This article compares and contrasts ‘ideal-type’ liberal and socialist conceptions of the three social values of freedom, individualism and equality. It then goes on to discuss how far social policy reflects these differing conceptions. The conclusion drawn is that, so far as social policy is concerned, in the clashes between liberal and socialist conceptions of social values liberal values tend to emerge as dominant.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , October 1975 , pp. 373 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Friedman, M., Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1962, p. 12.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., pp. 2–3, 25.

3 Schultz, H. J., Individualism or Collectivism, Boston: D. C. Heath, 1972, p. 79.Google Scholar

4 Lukes, S., Individualism; Oxford: Blackwell, 1973, p. 149.Google Scholar

5 Bremner, R. H., From the Depths – The Discovery of Poverty in the United States, New York: New York University Press, 1964, p. 267.Google Scholar

6 Arblaster, A., ‘Liberal Values and Socialist Values’, in Miliband, R. and Saville, J. (eds.), The Socialist Register, 1972, London: Merlin Press, 1972, p. 98.Google Scholar

7 Laski, H., A Grammar of Politics, London: Allen and Unwin, 1925, p. 170.Google Scholar

8 Tawney, R. H., Equality, London: Allen and Unwin, 1964, p. 233.Google Scholar

9 Guardian, 1 February 1974.

10 Titmuss, R. M., Essays on the Welfare State, London: Allen and Unwin, 1963, p. 52.Google Scholar

11 Greve, J., Page, D. and Greve, S., Homeless in London, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1971, p. 86.Google Scholar

12 Hayek, F. A., The Road to Serfdom, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1944, p. 12.Google Scholar

13 Lukes, S., op. cit., p. 151.Google Scholar

14 Quoted in Basso, L., ‘What Kind of Individuality?’, in Coates, K. (ed.), Essays on Socialist Humanism, Spokesman Books, 1972, p. 58.Google Scholar

15 Vickers, G., Freedom in a Rocking Boat, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1972, p. 184.Google Scholar

16 McGregor, O. R., ‘The Stability of the Family in the Welfare State’, Political Quarterly, 1960, Vol. 31, p. 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17 Tawney, R. H., The Acquisitive Society, London: Fontana, 1961, p. 48.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., p. 80.

19 Pinker, R. A., Social Theory and Social Policy, London: Heinemann, 1971, p. 201.Google Scholar

20 Ryan, W., Blaming the Victim, Boston: Orbach and Chambers, 1971, p. 7.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., p. 110.

22 George, V. and Wilding, P., Motherless Families, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972, Chapter 6.Google Scholar

23 Rimlinger, G. V., ‘Social Security in the United States and the U.S.S.R.’, in Zald, M. (ed.), Social Welfare Institutions, New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1965, p. 107.Google Scholar

24 Pinker, R. A., op. cit., p. 90.Google Scholar

25 ibid., p. 50.

26 Social Insurance and Allied Services, Cmd. 6404, London: HMSO, 1942, para. 421.Google Scholar

27 Wynn, M., Family Policy, London: Michael Joseph, 1970, p. 233.Google Scholar

28 Op. cit., para. 21.

29 Pinker, R. A., op. cit., p. 142.Google Scholar

30 Fitzherbert, K., West Indian Children in London, Occasional papers on Social Administration No. 19, London: Bell, 1967, p. 41.Google Scholar

31 Romanyshyn, J. M., Social Welfare: Charity to Justice, New York: Random House, 1971, p. 40.Google Scholar

32 Crosland, C. A. R., The Future of Socialism, London: Jonathan Cape, 1956, p. 113.Google Scholar

33 Raphael, D. D., ‘Taxation and Social Justice’, in Crick, B. and Robson, W. A. (eds.), Taxation Policy, London: Penguin Books, 1973, p. 54.Google Scholar

34 Peston, M., ‘Incentives, Distortion and the System of Taxation’, in B. Crick and W. A. Robson, op. cit., p. 64.Google Scholar

35 Goldthorpe, J. H., ‘Social Inequality and Social Integration in Modem Britain’, Advancement of Science, 26, 1969–1970, p. 202.Google Scholar

36 Balogh, , Labour and Inflation. The Fabian Society: Fabian Tract 403, 1970, p. 61.Google Scholar

37 Tawney, R. H., Equality, op. cit., p. 103.Google Scholar

38 Educational Priority, London: HMSO, 1972, p. 6.Google Scholar

39 Titmuss, R. M., Introduction to R. H. Tawney, Equality, op. cit., p. 11.Google Scholar

40 Educational Priority, op. cit., p. 8.

41 Wedge, P. and Presser, H., Born to Fail, London: Arrow Books, 1973.Google Scholar

42 Children and their Primary Schools, London: HMSO, 1967, para. 152.Google Scholar

43 Education, a framework for expansion, Cmnd. 5174, London: HMSO, 1972.Google Scholar

44 Webb, A. L. and Sieve, J. E. B., Income Redistribution and the Welfare State, Occasional Papers on Social Administration No. 41, London: Bell, 1971, p. 12.Google Scholar

45 Meacher, M., ‘The Coming Class Straggle’, New Statesman, 4 01 1974, p. 7.Google Scholar

46 Quoted in Atkinson, A. B., ‘The Reform of Wealth Taxes in Britain’, in Crick, B. and Robson, W. A., Taxation Policy, op. cit., p. 103.Google Scholar

47 Kincaid, J. C., Poverty and Equality in Britain, London: Penguin Books, 1973, p. 109.Google Scholar

48 Meacher, M., op. cit.Google Scholar

49 Rex, J., Key Problems of Sociological Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961, p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar