No (social) construction without (meta-)representation: Modular mechanisms as a basis for the capacity to acquire an understanding of mind
Tim P. German a1andAlan M. Leslie a2 a1 Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660
german@psych.ucsb.edu a2 Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
aleslie@ruccs.rutgers.edu
Abstract
Theories that propose a modular basis for developing a “theory of mind” have no problem accommodating social interaction or social environment factors into either the learning process, or into the genotypes underlying the growth of the neurocognitive modules. Instead, they can offer models which constrain and hence explain the mechanisms through which variations in social interaction affect development. Cognitive models of both competence and performance are critical to evaluating the basis of correlations between variations in social interaction and performance on mental state reasoning tasks.