Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:26:38.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do movement planning and control represent independent modules?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Valérie Gaveau  and
Michel Desmurget
Valérie Gaveau*
Affiliation:
Space and Action Unit, INSERM U534, Bron, 69500, Francehttp://www.lyon.inserm.fr/534
Michel Desmurget*
Affiliation:
Space and Action Unit, INSERM U534, Bron, 69500, Francehttp://www.lyon.inserm.fr/534
*
gaveau@lyon.inserm.fr
desmurget@lyon.inserm.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We address three issues that might be important in evaluating the validity of the planning–control model: (1) It could be artificial to distinguish between control and planning when control involves the re-planning of a new corrective submovement that overlaps with the initial response; (2) experiments involving illusions are not totally compelling; (3) selectively implicating the superior parietal lobe in movement control and the basal ganglia in movement planning, appears questionable.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 35 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)