Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:04:50.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scrambling and the Survive Principle. By Michael T. Putnam. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 115.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2007. Pp. ix, 216. Hardcover. €105. doi:10.1017/S1470542708000081

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Gema Chocano
Gema Chocano*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
*
Departamento de Filología Inglesa, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Francisco Tomás y Valiente, 1, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain, [gema.chocano@uam.es]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
REVIEWS
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 275 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackema, Peter, & Neeleman, Ad. 2003. Context-sensitive spell-out. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21.681–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko, & Takahashi, Daiko. 1998. Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 29.347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Michael. 1995. Lexico-logical form: A radically minimalist theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael. 1998. Projection and phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry 29.367–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Michael. 2002. On the status of representations and derivations. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, ed. by Epstein, Samuel D. and Seely, T. Daniel, 19–41. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chocano, Gema. 2007. Narrow syntax and phonological form: Scrambling in the Germanic languages (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert, & van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1996. The position of the head and the domain of scrambling. Typology, prototypes, item orderings, and universals. Proceedings of the LP’96 Conference on Word Order, Prague 1996, ed. by Palek, B., 57–90. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly. 1997. Yiddish VP order and the typology of movement in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.369–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 1993. The return of the base generators. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36.1–74.Google Scholar
Frampton, John, & Gutmann, Sam. 2002. Crash-proof syntax. Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, ed. by Epstein, Samuel D. and Seely, T. Daniel, 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans Martin, & Steinbach, Markus. 2003. What do reduced pronominals reveal about the syntax of Dutch and German? Part 1: Clause-internal positions. Linguistische Berichte 195.257–294.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2000. Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left. Doctoral dissertation. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality movement dependencies. (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert, & Rosengren, Inger. 1998. Scrambling. Sprache und Pragmatik 49.1–104.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert, & Rosengren, Inger. 2003. Scrambling: Non-triggered chain formation in OV languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15.203–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete category fronting. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya, & Reuland, Eric. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24.657–720.Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation. Boston, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas. 1999. The survive principle. Linguistic Analysis 29.278–303.Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas. 2007. Locality in minimalist syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stroik, Thomas, and Putnam, Michael T.. 2007. Surviving reconstruction. Phases at the Interfaces, ed. by Grohmann, K.. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 2001. Verb movement variation in Germanic and optimality theory. Habilitationschrift. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.Google Scholar