Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T18:13:32.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Wong Lineage Land: Property and Belonging in the New Territories of Hong Kong in 1904

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

GÖRAN AIJMER
GÖRAN AIJMER*
Affiliation:
Gothenburg Research Institute
*
*Email: goran.aijmer@newyork.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay explores the distribution of the ownership of land in a coastal village in the New Territories of Hong Kong at the beginning of the last century. The study examines land and houses as indices of relative wealth in a poor community. Above all, it points to the discursive social use of land as a genealogical tract in an area where written genealogies would have been scarce or nonexisting. Belonging in terms of agnatic continuity and its ramifications over time were mapped out in the agricultural landscape to form a complete depicting graph.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 6 , November 2008 , pp. 1079 - 1111
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aijmer, G. ‘An enquiry into Chinese settlement patterns: The rural squatters of Hong Kong’ in Man (N.S.), Vol. 10 (1975), pp. 559–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, G.Economic Man in Sha Tin: Vegetable Farmers in a Hong Kong Valley (London: Curzon Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Aijmer, G. ‘Introduction’ in Aijmer, G. (ed.), Leadership on the China Coast (London: Curzon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Aijmer, G.Atomistic Society in Sha Tin: Immigrants in a Hong Kong Valley (Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 1986).Google Scholar
Anderson, E. N. Jr. ‘Lineage atrophy in Chinese society’ in American Anthropologist, Vol. 72 (1970), 363–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H. D. R.A Chinese Lineage Village: Sheung Shui (London: Frank Cass & Co., 1968).Google Scholar
Beattie, H. J.Land and Lineage in China: A Study of T'ung-ch'eng County, Anhwei, in the Ming and Ch'ing Dynasties (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Brim, J. A.Local Systems and Modernizing Change in the New Territories of Hong Kong (Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1970).Google Scholar
Chiu, T. N. ‘Land use problems in the extreme east of the New Territories’ in Davis, S. G. (ed.), Land Use Problems in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Freedman, M.Lineage Organization in Southeastern China (London: Athlone Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Freedman, M.Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtung (London: Athlone Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Gazetteer, A Gazetteer of Place Names in Hong Kong, Kowloon and the New Territories (Hong Kong: S. Young, Government Printer, 1960).Google Scholar
Gompertz, H. H. J.Appendix 1a. Report on the New Territories for the Year 1900 (Sessional Papers 1901) (Hong Kong: Government Printer, 1901).Google Scholar
Grant, C. J.The Soils and Agriculture of Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Government Printer, 1964).Google Scholar
Groves, R. G. and Walker, M. ‘Rice farming in Hong Kong’ in The Geographical Magazine, Vol. 39 (1967), 751–63.Google Scholar
Hayes, J.The Hong Kong Region 1850–1911: Institutions and Leadership in Town and Countryside (Folkestone: Dawson; Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1977).Google Scholar
Lockhart, J. H. S.Report on the New Territory During the First Year of British Administration, Hong Kong. Papers laid before the Legislative Council by Command of His Excellency the Officer Administrating the Government (No. 15/1900) (Hong Kong: Government Printer, 1900).Google Scholar
Lockhart, J. H. S.Some Notes on Land Tenure in the New Territories (Appendix No. 1). Report on the New Territories for the Year 1900 (Sessional Papers 1901) (Hong Kong: Government Printer, 1901).Google Scholar
Nelson, H. C. ‘The Chinese descent system and the occupancy level of village houses’ in Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 9 (1969), 113–23.Google Scholar
Ng, R. ‘Economic life and the family’ in Aspects of Social Organization in the New Territories. The Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Weekend Symposium 9th–10th May, 1964 (Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1965).Google Scholar
Potter, J. M.Capitalism and the Chinese Peasant: Social and Economic Change in a Hong Kong Village (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Potter, J. M. ‘Land and lineage in traditional China’ in Freedman, M. (ed.), Family and Kinship in Chinese Society (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
da Silva, A.Tai Yu Shan: Traditional Ecological Adaptation in a South Chinese Island (Taipei, Taiwan: The Orient Cultural Service, 1972).Google Scholar
Strauch, J. ‘Landlord and tenant in rural Hong Kong: Traditional land tenure in a rapidly changing world’. Paper presented to a panel on ‘Current Anthropological Studies of Hong Kong’, American Anthropological Association, 78th Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, 1979.Google Scholar
Watson, J. L.Emigration and the Chinese Lineage: The Mans in Hong Kong and London (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Watson, R. S.Inequality Among Brothers: Class and Kinship in South China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickberg, E. ‘Another look at land and lineage in the New Territories ca. 1900’ in Journal of the Hong Kong Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 21 (1981), 25–42.Google Scholar
Wodehouse, P. P. J.Report on the Census of the Colony for 1911. Papers laid before the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Government Printer, 1911).Google Scholar
Wong, C. T. ‘Changes in agricultural land use in Hong Kong’ in Davis, S. G. (ed.), Land Use Problems in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1964).Google Scholar