Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T04:00:38.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Path dependence, time lags and the birth of globalisation: A critique of O'Rourke and Williamson

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2004

DENNIS O. FLYNN
Affiliation:
Economics Department, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, California 95211, USA
ARTURO GIRÁLDEZ
Affiliation:
Economics Department, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, California 95211, USA
Get access

Extract

In a recent issue of the European Review of Economic History (vol. 6, 2002, pp. 23–50), Kevin O'Rourke and Jeffrey Williamson dismiss claims by ‘World historians…[who] argue that globalisation is a phenomenon which stretches back several centuries, or even several millennia’ (p. 23). Rather, O'Rourke and Williamson insist that ‘[g]lobalisation did not begin 5,000 years ago, or even 500 years ago. It began in the early nineteenth century. In that sense, it is a very modern phenomenon’ (p. 47). O'Rourke and Williamson offer an explicit model of world trade that predicts specific outcomes; and they marshal empirical evidence to support their contention that there was no global economy until the early decades of the nineteenth century.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)