Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T18:24:30.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Democracy and the Logic of Political Survival

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

KEVIN A. CLARKE*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
RANDALL W. STONE*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
*
Kevin A. Clarke is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0146 (kevin.clarke@rochester.edu).
Randall W. Stone is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0146 (randall.stone@rochester.edu).

Abstract

Although democracy is a key concept in political science, debate continues over definitions and mechanisms. Bueno de Mesquita, Smith, Siverson, & Morrow (2003) make the important claim that most of democracy's effects are in fact due to something conceptually simpler and empirically easier to measure than democracy: the size of the minimum winning coalition that selects the leader. The argument is intuitively appealing and supported by extensive data analysis. Unfortunately, the statistical technique they use induces omitted variable bias into their results. They argue that they need to control for democracy, but their estimation procedure is equivalent to omitting democracy from their analysis. When we reestimate their regressions controlling for democracy, most of their important findings do not survive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the Worlds Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberger, Arthur S. 1964. Econometric Theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen, Satyanath, Shanker, and Sergenti, Ernest. 2005. “Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Effects of Accountability and Obstacles to Policy Change.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (October): 897907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Peter E. 1982. “Eliminating Problems Caused by Multicollinearity: A Warning.” The Journal of Economic Education 13 (Winter): 6264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, John C. 1976. “Second Generation Research in Economic Education: Problems of Specification and Interdependence.” The Journal of Economic Education 8 (Autumn): 4048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, Craig. 1978. “Comments on the Problems of Specification and Interdependence in a Set of Learning Equations.” The Journal of Economic Education 9 (Spring): 8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar