Utilitas



Broome's Argument against Value Incomparability


ERIK CARLSON a1c1
a1 Uppsala University

Article author query
carlson e   [Google Scholar] 
 

Abstract

John Broome has argued that alleged cases of value incomparability are really examples of vagueness in the betterness relation. The main premiss of his argument is ‘the collapsing principle’. I argue that this principle is dubious, and that Broome's argument is therefore unconvincing.


Correspondence:
c1 Erik.Carlson@filosofi.uu.se