Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T00:38:07.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Retroflex fricatives in Slavic languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2004

Silke Hamann
Affiliation:
ZAS (Centre of General Linguistics), Berlin silke@zas.gwz-berlin.de

Abstract

The present study explores the phonetic and phonological grounds on which postalveolar fricatives in Polish can be analysed as retroflex, and considers whether postalveolar fricatives in other Slavic languages are retroflex as well. Velarization and incompatibility with front vowels are introduced as articulatory criteria for retroflexion, based on cross-linguistic data. According to these criteria, Polish and Russian have retroflex fricatives (i.e., /[small s with hook]/ and /[small z with retroflex hook]/), whereas Bulgarian has a laminal palatoalveolar fricative ((/[small Esh]/). In addition, it is illustrated that palatalization of retroflex fricatives in Slavic languages (and in general) causes a phonetic and phonological change to a non-retroflex fricative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)