Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T09:16:36.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Long-Term Retention of French by Dutch Students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Abstract

The present study investigated the retention of school-learned French language skills in Dutch students across a period of 4 years following the training period. Two training levels were investigated: 4 and 6 years of French training. The skills tested were all receptive: general receptive proficiency; listening and reading comprehension; and receptive phonological, lexical, and grammatical skills. In addition, self-assessment measures were administered.

The results indicated that global skills improved, if anything, and that only lexical and, particularly, grammatical skills “attrited” during the period investigated. On the other hand, subjects' self-perception of their retention was much more negative.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, R. (1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In Lambert, R. & Freed, B. (Eds.), The loss of language skills (pp. 83118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bahrick, H. (1984). Fifty years of second language attrition: Implications for programmatic research. Modern Language Journal, 68, 105118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. (1981). Language. In Barrows, T. (Ed.), College students' knowledge and beliefs: A survey of global understanding (pp. 2535, 87100). New Rochelle, NY: Change Magazine Press.Google Scholar
Cross, D. (1982). Aural discrimination and achievement. The British Journal of Language Teaching, 20, 139143.Google Scholar
Heurlin, K. (1972). Vive le français. Zutphen, Netherlands: Thieme.Google Scholar
Kennedy, L. (1932). The retention of certain Latin syntactical principles by first and second year Latin students after various time intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 23, 132146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorcroft, R., & Gardner, R. (1987). Linguistic factors in second language loss. Language Learning 37, 327340.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00574.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. (1984). Interpreting Harry Bahrick's discovery: What confers immunity against forgetting? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 3235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, B., & Berko-Gleason, J. (1986). The study of language loss: Models and hypotheses for an emerging discipline. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 193206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratella, W. (1969). The retention of first and second year Spanish over the period of the summer vacation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 3, 235A.Google Scholar
Robison, R. (1985). The effect of the summer vacation on language attrition in secondary school students of first-year Spanish. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 637A.Google Scholar
Scherer, G. (1957). The forgetting rate in learning German. German Quarterly, 30, 275277.10.2307/401773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schils, E. (1988). Bootstraps, een nieuw statistisch alternatief. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen, 31, 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythe, P., Jutras, C., Bramwell, J., & Gardner, R. (1973). Second language retention over varying intervals. Modern Language Journal, 57, 400405.Google Scholar
Van Els, T. & Extra, G. (1987). Foreign and second language teaching in Western Europe: A comparative overview of needs, objectives and policies. In Ammon, U., Mattheier, K., & Nelde, P. (Eds.), Sociotinguistica 1: Main issues in sociolinguistics (pp. 100125). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Weltens, B. (1989). The attrition of French as a foreign language. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar