Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T07:18:30.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expressive language style among adolescents and adults with Williams syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

NICOLE A. CRAWFORD
Affiliation:
University of Louisville
LISA R. EDELSON
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
DANIELA PLESA SKWERER*
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
HELEN TAGER-FLUSBERG
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Daniela Plesa Skwerer, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, Boston, MA 02118-1301. E-mail: dplesas@bu.edu

Abstract

Language samples elicited through a picture description task were recorded from 38 adolescents and adults with Williams syndrome (WS) and one control group matched on age, and another matched on age, IQ, and vocabulary knowledge. The samples were coded for use of various types of inferences, dramatic devices, and verbal fillers; acoustic analyses of prosodic features were carried out, and an independent group of judges provided global ratings of the overall expressiveness of the language. In addition, a standardized measure of social adaptive functioning was administered to the parents of the participants with WS. The findings revealed distinctive developmental trends in the use of expressive content and prosodic patterns by adolescents and adults with WS that were not evident among the controls. Ratings of expressiveness by naive judges of the speech samples produced by the participants with WS were related to parent evaluations of adaptive social communication skills; however, the verbal productions of this group were not judged to be significantly more expressive than those of controls.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bellugi, U., Marks, S., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1988). Disassociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In Bishop, D. & Mogford, K. (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2006). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.4.20) [Computer program]. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from http://www.praat.org/Google Scholar
Bruininks, R. H., Woodcock, R. W., Weatherman, R. F., & Hill, B. K. (1996). Scales of Independent Behavior—Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Constantino, J. N. (2004). The Social Responsiveness Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. & McGregor, K. (1998). An overview of prosody and its role in normal and disordered child language. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 7 3848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Gosch, A., & Pankau, R. (1997). Personality characteristics and behaviour problems in individuals of different ages with Williams syndrome. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39 527533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A. et al. , (2000). Hypersociability in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (Suppl.), 3046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Brown, J. H., Grice, S., & Paterson, S. (2003). Dethroning the myth: Cognitive dissociations and innate modularity in Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23 227242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, A., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Kernan, K., Sabsay, S., & Rein, R. P. (1986). Aspects of verbal behavior cited by listeners in judging speakers as retarded or not retarded. Mental Retardation and Learning Disability Bulletin, 14 2443.Google Scholar
Klein-Tasman, B. P., & Mervis, C. B. (2003). Distinctive personality characteristics of 8-, 9-, and 10-year-olds with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23 269290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laws, G., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2004). Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: A comparison with Down's syndrome and specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39 4564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losh, M., Bellugi, U., Reilly, J., & Anderson, D. (2000). Narrative as a social engagement tool: The excessive use of evaluation in narratives from children with Williams syndrome. Narrative Inquiry, 10 265290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (1999). The Williams syndrome cognitive profile: Strengths, weaknesses, and interrelations among auditory short term memory, language, and visuospatial constructive cognition. In Winograd, E., Fivush, R., & Hirst, W. (Eds.), Ecological approaches to cognition: Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser (pp. 193227). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B. (2003). Williams syndrome: 15 years of psychological research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mervis, C. B. (2006). Language abilities in Williams–Beuren syndrome. In Morris, C. A., Lenhoff, H. M., & Wang, P. P. (Eds.), Williams–Beuren Syndrome: Research, evaluation, and treatment (pp. 159206). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B., Robinson, B. F., Bertrand, J., Morris, C. A., Klein-Tasman, B. P., & Armstrong, S. C. (2000). The Williams syndrome cognitive profile. Brain and Cognition, 44 604628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, C. A. (2006). The dysmorphology, genetics, and natural history of Williams–Beuren syndrome. In Morris, C. A., Lenhoff, H. M., & Wang, P. P. (Eds.), Williams–Beuren syndrome: Research, evaluation, and treatment (pp. 317). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, L. R. (2006). The molecular basis of a multisystem disorder. In Morris, C. A., Lenhoff, H. M., & Wang, P. P. (Eds.), Williams–Beuren Syndrome: Research, evaluation, and treatment (pp. 1858). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC): LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reilly, J., Klima, E. S., & Bellugi, U. (1990). Once more with feeling: Affect and language in atypical populations. Development and Psychopathology, 2 367391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U., & Wulfeck, B. (2004). “Frog, where are you?” Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury, and Williams syndrome. Brain and Language, 88 229247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shriberg, L. D., Paul, R., McSweeny, J. L., Klin, A., Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (2001). Speech and prosody characteristics of adolescents and adults with high-functioning autism and asperger syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44 10971115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shriberg, S., & Widder, C. J. (1990). Speech and prosody characteristics of adults with mental retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33 627653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidtis, J. J., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2003). A neurobehavioral approach to dysprosody. Seminars in Speech and Language, 24 93105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stojanovik, V. (2006). Social interaction deficits and conversational inadequacy in Williams syndrome. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19 157173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanovik, V., Perkins, M., & Howard, S. (2004). Williams syndrome and specific language impairment do not support claims for developmental double dissociations and innate modularity. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17 403424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1990). Expressive language of children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 37 (Suppl.), 108114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar