Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:58:20.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding Languages of Modernization: A Southeast Asian View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1999

Jonathan Rigg
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Anna Allott
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies
Rachel Harrison
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies
Ulrich Kratz
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies

Abstract

More than most of humanity, scholars are prone to sinking their feet into the quagmire of definition. Words are unpacked, nuances of meaning are debated, and discourses are interrogated. Post-developmentalists have been at the forefront of a re-examination of the languages of development and developmentalism. Arturo Escobar, for example, states that his desire is to analyze ‘regimes of discourse and representation’ (1995: 10). Jonathan Crush is similarly concerned with the so-styled discourse of development, and expresses the desire to make the ‘self-evident problematical’ (1995: 3). He highlights work in the humanities and social sciences which concerns itself with textual issues of writing and representation through which this discourse has been framed. Crush suggests that such textual analysis offers ‘new ways of understanding what development is and does, and why it seems so difficult to think beyond it’. He goes on to argue that ‘we need to not only understand why the language of development can be so evasive, even misleading, but also why so many people in so many parts of the world seem to need to believe it and have done so for so long’ (1995: 4).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)