Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T09:35:16.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lyapunov maps, simplicial complexes and the Stone functor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Joel W. Robbin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Dietmar A. Salamon
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

Abstract

Let be an attractor network for a dynamical system ft: MM, indexed by the lower sets of a partially ordered set P. Our main theorem asserts the existence of a Lyapunov map ψ:MK(P) which defines the attractor network. This result is used to prove the existence of connection matrices for discrete-time dynamical systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Cairns, S. S.. A simple triangulation method for smooth manifolds. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1951), 389390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cohen, R. L., Jones, J. D. S. & Segal, G. B.. To appear.Google Scholar
[3]Conley, C. C.. Isolated invariant sets and the Morse index. CBMS Reg. Conf. Series Math., Vol. 38. Amer. Math. Soc: Providence, RI 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Conley, C. C.. The gradient structure of a flow. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 8 (1988), 1126.Google Scholar
[5]Conley, C. C. & Zehnder, E.. Morse type index theory for flows and periodic solutions for Hamiltonian equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (1984), 207253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Eilenberg, S. & Steenrod, N.. Foundations of Algebraic Topology. Princeton, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Folkman, J.. The homology groups of a lattice. J. Math. & Mech. 15 (1966), 631636.Google Scholar
[8]Franzosa, R.. Index fitrations and the homology index braid for partially ordered Morse decompositions, Amer. Math. Soc. Trans. 298 (1986), 193213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Franzosa, R.. The continuation theory for Morse decompositions and connection matrices. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 310 (1988), 781803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Franzosa, R.. The connection matrix theory for Morse decompositions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 311 (1989), 561592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Johnstone, P.. Stone spaces, Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1982.Google Scholar
[12]Kelly, J.. General Topology. Van Nostrand, 1955.Google Scholar
[13]Mrozek, M.. The Morse equation in Conley's index theory for homeomorphisms. Preprint, University of Krakow (1988).Google Scholar
[14]Palis, J. & de Melo, W.. Geometric Theory of Dynamical Systems. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Robbin, J. W. & Salamon, D. A.. Dynamical systems, shape theory and the Conley index. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 8 (1988), 375393.Google Scholar
[16]Rota, G. C.. On the foundations of combinatorial theory. Z. Warscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 2 (1964), 340368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Salamon, D. A.. Connected simple systems and the Conley index of isolated invariant sets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 291 (1985), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Salamon, D.. Morse theory, the Conley index and Floer homology. Bull. L. M. S. 22 (1990), 113140.Google Scholar
[19]Segal, G.. Classifying spaces and spectral sequences Publ. Math. IHES.Google Scholar
[20]Smale, S.. Differentiable dynamical systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 747817;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in: The Mathematics of Time. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1980.Google Scholar
[21]Smoller, J.. Shock Waves and Reaction Diffusion Equations. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Spanier, E.. Algebraic Topology. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1966.Google Scholar
[23]Stone, M.. Topological representation of distributive lattices and Brouwerian logics. Casopis Pest. Mat. Fys. 67 (1937), 127Google Scholar
[24]Witten, E.. Supersymmetry and Morse theory. J. Diff. Geom. 17 (1982), 661692.Google Scholar
[25]Zeeman, E. C.. On the filtered differential group. Ann. Math. 66 (1957), 557585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Wilson, W.. Smoothing derivative of functions and applications. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (1969), 413428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar