Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:53:53.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A modular version of Jensen's formula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

David E. Rohrlich
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, U.S.A.

Extract

A well-known result of classical function theory, Jensen's formula, expresses the integral around a circle of the log modulus of a meromorphic function in terms of the log modulus of the zeros and poles of that function lying inside the circle. Explicitly, if F is a meromorphic function on the unit disc {ω ε ℂ: |ω| < 1} and F(0) = 1, then, for 0 < r < 1,

where ordωF is the order of F at ω. The purpose of this note is to observe that a formula analogous to (1) holds when F is replaced by a modular function for SL2(ℤ) and the integral by a suitable double integral over a fundamental domain. We shall derive this modular variant of Jensen's formula from the usual version by applying the Rankin-Selberg method and the first Kronecker limit formula. The argument admits some extension to Fuchsian groups other than SL2(ℤ), and to modular forms of weight other than zero; this point will be discussed later.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Goldstein, L.J.. Dedekind sums for a Fuchsian group. I and II. Nagoya Math. J. 50 (1973), 2147, 53 (1974), 171187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Kubota, T., Introduction to Eisenstein Series (Halsted Press, 1973).Google Scholar
[3] Lang, S.. Elliptic Functions (Addison-Wesley, 1973).Google Scholar
[4] Rankin, R. A.. Contributions to the theory of Ramanujan's function r(n) and similar arithmetical functions. II. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 35 (1939), 351372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Selberg, A.. Bemerkungen über eine Dirichletsche Reihe die mit der Theorie der Modulformen nahe verbunden ist. Arch. Math. Naturvid. 43 (1940), 4750.Google Scholar