Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-17T11:19:38.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Newell Test for a theory of cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2004

John R. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology–BH345D, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA15213-3890http://act.psy.cmu.edu/ACT/people/ja.html
Christian Lebiere*
Affiliation:
Human Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA15213-3890http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/~cl

Abstract:

Newell (1980; 1990) proposed that cognitive theories be developed in an effort to satisfy multiple criteria and to avoid theoretical myopia. He provided two overlapping lists of 13 criteria that the human cognitive architecture would have to satisfy in order to be functional. We have distilled these into 12 criteria: flexible behavior, real-time performance, adaptive behavior, vast knowledge base, dynamic behavior, knowledge integration, natural language, learning, development, evolution, and brain realization. There would be greater theoretical progress if we evaluated theories by a broad set of criteria such as these and attended to the weaknesses such evaluations revealed. To illustrate how theories can be evaluated we apply these criteria to both classical connectionism (McClelland & Rumelhart 1986; Rumelhart & McClelland 1986b) and the ACT-R theory (Anderson & Lebiere 1998). The strengths of classical connectionism on this test derive from its intense effort in addressing empirical phenomena in such domains as language and cognitive development. Its weaknesses derive from its failure to acknowledge a symbolic level to thought. In contrast, ACT-R includes both symbolic and subsymbolic components. The strengths of the ACT-R theory derive from its tight integration of the symbolic component with the subsymbolic component. Its weaknesses largely derive from its failure, as yet, to adequately engage in intensive analyses of issues related to certain criteria on Newell's list.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1. The complete list of published ACT-R models between 1997 and 2002 is available from the ACT-R home page at: http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/