Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Open Peer Commentary

Human drug addiction is more than faulty decision-making

Carl L. Harta1a2 and Robert M. Kraussa2

a1 Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032

a2 Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027. clh42@columbia.edu http://substanceabuse.columbia.edu/hart.htm rmk@psych.columbia.edu http://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/commlab/

Abstract

We commend Redish et al. for the progress they have made in bringing a measure of theoretical order to the processes that underlie drug addiction. However, incorporating information about situations in which drug users do not exhibit faulty decision-making into the theory would greatly enhance its generality and practical value. This commentary draws attention to the relevant human substance abuse literature.

Related Articles

    A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process A. David Redish, Steve Jensen and Adam Johnson Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 redish@umn.edu http://umn.edu/~redish/; Graduate Program in Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 jens0491@umn.edu; Graduate Program in Neuroscience and Center for Cognitive Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 john5726@umn.edu
    Metrics