Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Open Peer Commentary

Different vulnerabilities for addiction may contribute to the same phenomena and some additional interactions

Andrew James Goudiea1, Matt Fielda1 and Jon Colea1

a1 School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. ajg@liverpool.ac.uk m.field@liverpool.ac.uk j.c.cole@liverpool.ac.uk

Abstract

The framework for addiction offered by the target article can perhaps be simplified into fewer, more basic, vulnerabilities. “Impulsivity” covers a number of vulnerabilities, not just enhanced delay discounting. Real-world drug-use decisions involve both delay and probability discounting. The motivational salience of, and attentional bias for, drug cues may be related to a number of vulnerabilities. Interactions among vulnerabilities are of significance and complicate the application of this framework.

Metrics