Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Open Peer Commentary

Different vulnerabilities for addiction may contribute to the same phenomena and some additional interactions

Andrew James Goudiea1, Matt Fielda1 and Jon Colea1

a1 School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZA, United Kingdom. ajg@liverpool.ac.uk m.field@liverpool.ac.uk j.c.cole@liverpool.ac.uk

Abstract

The framework for addiction offered by the target article can perhaps be simplified into fewer, more basic, vulnerabilities. “Impulsivity” covers a number of vulnerabilities, not just enhanced delay discounting. Real-world drug-use decisions involve both delay and probability discounting. The motivational salience of, and attentional bias for, drug cues may be related to a number of vulnerabilities. Interactions among vulnerabilities are of significance and complicate the application of this framework.

Related Articles

    A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process A. David Redish, Steve Jensen and Adam Johnson Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 redish@umn.edu http://umn.edu/~redish/; Graduate Program in Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 jens0491@umn.edu; Graduate Program in Neuroscience and Center for Cognitive Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 john5726@umn.edu
    Metrics