Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:50:17.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WAS TRADITIONAL CHINESE LAW A MERE “MODEL”? PART ONE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2004

Shigeo Nakamura
Shigeo Nakamura
Affiliation:
Kanazawa University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A frequently discussed theory about the nature and function of traditional Chinese law claims that, in traditional China, law was no more than a model, with little practical applicability. This theory seems to be still dominant.

On a different occasion in the past, I presented some doubts about this theory of law as a “model”, based on impressions I received from reading through a body of judgments from Qing dynasty lawsuits.

Type
Law, State and Society in China [1]
Information
International Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 139 - 157
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)