Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T14:01:03.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How galaxies gain and lose their angular momentum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

Elena D'Onghia*
Affiliation:
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland email: elena@physik.unizh.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Spiral, fast-rotating galaxies like the Milky Way are the most common type in the Universe. One of the most pressing challenges faced by current models of galaxy formation is the origin of their angular momentum and disk. According to the standard tidal-torque theory the galactic spin is originated by tidal interactions between dark halos around galaxies and neighboring structures in the expanding Universe. We use a large cosmological N-body simulation to study the origin of possible correlations between the merging history and spin of cold dark matter halos. In particular, we examine claims that remnants of major mergers tend to have higher-than-average spins, and find that the effect is driven largely by unrelaxed systems: equilibrium dark matter halos show no significant correlation between spin and merging history. Out-of-equilibrium halos have, on average, higher spin than relaxed systems, suggesting that the virialization process leads to a net decrease in the value of the spin parameter. We present also high-resolution N-body/SPH cosmological simulations including cold gas and dark matter to investigate the processes by which gas loses its angular momentum during the protogalactic collapse phase, leading to simulated disk galaxies that are too compact with respect to the observations. We show that the gas and the dark matter have similar specific angular momenta until a merger event occurs at redshift 2. All the gas involved in the merger loses a substantial fraction of its specific angular momentum due to tidal torques and falls quickly into the center. Dynamical friction by small infalling substructures plays a minor role, in contrast to previous claims.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

D'Onghia, E. & Burkert, A. 2004, ApJ, 612, L13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onghia, E., Burkert, A., Murante, G., & Khochfar, S. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onghia, E. & Navarro, J. F. 2007, MNRAS, 380, L58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. P. 2001, ApJ, 557, 616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Governato, F. et al. 2007, MNRAS, 374, 1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. F. & Benz, W. 1991, ApJ, 380, 320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. F. & White, S. D. M 1994, MNRAS, 267, 401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, B. et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitvitska, M. et al. 2002, ApJ, 581, 799CrossRefGoogle Scholar