Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:41:26.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The phenomenal dissociation between coloration and object-hole effects in the watercolor illusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2008

MARIA TANCA
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze dei Linguaggi, University of Sassari, Italy
BAINGIO PINNA*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze dei Linguaggi, University of Sassari, Italy
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Baingio Pinna, Facoltà di Lingue e Letterature Straniere, Dipartimento di Scienze dei Linguaggi, University of Sassari, via Roma 151, I-07100 Sassari, Italy. E-mail: baingio@uniss.it

Abstract

The watercolor illusion is a color spreading effect at long-range diffusing from a thin colored contour juxtaposed to a chromatic one of higher contrast and a object-hole effect across a large area (Pinna, 1987; Pinna et al., 2001, 2003; Pinna & Reeves, 2006). The watercolored figure appears evenly colored by an opaque light veil of chromatic tint (coloration effect), with a clear surface color property spreading from the lighter contour. At the same time, the watercolored figure manifests a strong figure-ground organization and a solid figural appearance comparable to a bas-relief illuminated from the top (object-hole effect). It appears similar to a rounded surface segregated in depth, which extends out from the flat surface. The complementary region appears as a hole or empty space. The phenomenal properties of coloration and object-hole effects raise some questions. Can the two effects be considered relatively independent? Under what conditions can a possible dissociation occur? How does the dissociation of one effect, say the coloration, influence the object-hole effect and vice versa? To answer these questions two new effects related to the watercolor illusion were psychophysically studied: (1) the “uneven watercolor,” based on a modified watercolor figure without volumetric and three-dimensional properties but with a strong coloration effect and (2) the “watercolor surface capture,” where oblique lines within a watercolor figure appear bulging, curved in depth and segregated from those that are perceived as placed in the background or perceived through holes. The results of two experiments suggest that the coloration effect can be dissociated from the object-hole one. These results are discussed in the light of a simple summation hypothesis of the underlying effects composing the whole figurality. This hypothesis can suggest further investigation both in the phenomenal and in the neurophysiological domain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baylis, G.C. & Driver, J. (2001). Shape-coding in IT cells generalizes over contrast and mirror reversal, but not figure-ground reversal. Nature Neuroscience 4, 937942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devinck, F., Delahunt, P.B., Hardy, J.L., Spillmann, L. & Werner, J.S. (2005). The watercolor effect: Quantitative evidence for luminance-dependent mechanisms of long-range color assimilation. Vision Research 45, 14131424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, H.S., Zhou, H. & von der Heydt, R. (2003). The coding of uniform color figures in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London) 54, 593613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossberg, S. (1987b). Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception II: Binocular theory. Perception & Psychophysics 41, 117158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. (1994). 3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex. Perception & Psychophysics 55, 48120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. (1997). Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional figure-ground perception of two-dimensional pictures. Psychological Review 104, 618658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. (2000). The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 233245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. (2004). How does the cerebral cortex work? Development, learning, attention, and 3D vision by laminar circuits of visual cortex. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 2, 4776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossberg, S. & Howe, P. (2003). A laminar cortical model of stereopsis and three-dimensional surface perception. Vision Research 43, 801829.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S., Hwang, S. & Mingolla, E. (2002). Thalamocortical dynamics of the McCollough effect: Boundary-surface alignment through perceptual learning. Vision Research 42, 12591286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. & Kelly, F. (1999). Neural dynamics of binocular brightness perception. Vision Research 39, 37963816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. & McLoughlin, N.P. (1997). Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional surface perception: Binocular and half-occluded scenic images. Neural Networks 10, 15831605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossberg, S. & Mingolla, E. (1985a). Neural dynamics of form perception. Boundary completion, illusory figures and neon color spreading. Psychological Review 92, 173211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. & Mingolla, E. (1985b). Neural dynamics of perceptual grouping: Textures, boundaries, and emergent segmentations. Perception & Psychophysics 38, 141171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. & Pessoa, L. (1998). Texture segregation, surface representation and figure-ground separation. Vision Research 38, 16571684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. & Swaminathan, G. (2004). A laminar cortical model for 3D perception of slanted and curved surfaces and of 2D images: Development, attention, and bistability. Vision Research 44, 11471187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. & Todorovic, D. (1988). Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: A unified model of classical and recent phenomena. Perception & Psychophysics 43, 241277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grossberg, S. & Yazdanbakhsh, A. (2004). Laminar cortical dynamics of 3D surface perception: Stratification, transparency, and neon color spreading. Vision Research 45, 17251743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, D. (1930). Die Erscheinungsweisen der Farben, 2nd edn. (Translation into English: R.B. MacLeod & C.W. Fox, 1935, The World of Color). London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kelly, F. & Grossberg, S. (2000). Neural dynamics of 3-D surface perception: Figure-ground separation and lightness perception. Perception & Psychophysics 62, 15961618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kourtzi, Z. & Kanwisher, N. (2001). Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293, 15061509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLoughlin, N.P. & Grossberg, S. (1998). Cortical computation of stereo disparity. Vision Research 38, 9199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metzger, W. (1930). Optische Untersuchungen am Ganzfeld: II. Zur phanomenologie des homogenen Ganzfelds [Optical investigation of the Ganzfeld: II Toward the phenomenology of the homogeneous Ganzfeld]. Psychologische Forschung 13, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, K. & Shimojo, S. (1990). Towards a neural understanding of visual surface representation. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 40, 911924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinna, B. (1987). Un effetto di colorazione. In Il laboratorio e la città. XXI Congresso degli Psicologi Italiani, ed. Majer, V., Maeran, M. & Santinello, M., p. 158. Milano: Edizioni SIPS.Google Scholar
Pinna, B. (2005). The role of Gestalt principle of similarity in the watercolor illusion. Spatial Vision 18, 185207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinna, B. (2006). The discoloration illusion. Visual Neuroscience 23, 583590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinna, B. (2007). Amodal completion of chromatic and achromatic colors. ICVS 2007, 19th SymposiumBrazil. São Paulo: EDUFPA.Google Scholar
Pinna, B. (2008). A new perceptual problem: The amodal completion of color. Visual Neuroscience 25, 415422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinna, B., Brelstaff, G. & Spillmann, L. (2001). Surface color from boundaries: A new ‘watercolor’ illusion. Vision Research 41, 26692676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinna, B. & Grossberg, S. (2005). The watercolor illusion and neon color spreading: A unified analysis of new cases and neural mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 22, 22072221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinna, B. & Reeves, A. (2006). Lighting, backlighting and watercolor illusions and the laws of figurality. Spatial Vision 19, 341373.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinna, B., Werner, J.S. & Spillmann, L. (2003). The watercolor effect: A new principle of grouping and figure-ground organization. Vision Research 43, 4352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, E. (1915). Synsoplevede Figurer. Kobenhavn: Glydendalske.Google Scholar
Rubin, E. (1921). Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Kobenhavn: Gyldendalske Boghandel.Google Scholar
Spillmann, L., Pinna, B. & Werner, J.S. (2004). Form-from-watercolour in perception and old maps. In Seeing Spatial Form, ed. Jenkin, M.R.M. & Harris, L.R.Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
von der Heydt, R. & Pierson, R. (2006). Dissociation of color and figure-ground effects in the watercolor illusion. Spatial Vision 19, 323340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von der Heydt, R., Zhou, H. & Friedman, H.S. (2003). Neural coding of border ownership: Implications for the theory of figure-ground perception. In Perceptual Organization in Vision: Behavioral and Neural Perspectives, ed. Behrmann, M., Kimchi, R. & Olson, C.R., pp. 281304. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Werner, J.S., Pinna, B. & Spillmann, L. (2007). The brain and the world of illusory colors. Scientific American 3, 9095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollschläger, D., Rodriguez, A.M. & Hoffman, D.D. (2002). Flank transparency: The effects of gaps, line spacing, and apparent motion. Perception 31, 10731092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, H, Friedman, H.S. & von der Heydt, R. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 20, 65946611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed