Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:12:03.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Binocular rivalry between identical retinal stimuli with an induced color difference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2008

SANG WOOK HONG  and
STEVEN K. SHEVELL
SANG WOOK HONG*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee Departments of Psychology and Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
STEVEN K. SHEVELL
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychology and Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Sang Wook Hong, Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, 405 Wilson Hall, 111 21stAvenue South, Nashville, TN 37203. E-mail: sang.w.hong@vanderbilt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An open question in color rivalry is whether alternation between two colors is caused by a difference in receptoral stimulation or a difference in the neural representation of color appearance. This question was examined with binocular rivalry between physically identical lights that differed in appearance due to chromatic induction. Perceptual alternation was measured between gratings of the same chromaticity; each one was presented within a different patterned surround that caused the gratings, one to each eye, to appear unequal in hue because of chromatic induction. The gratings were presented dichoptically with binocular disparity so the rivalrous gratings appeared in front of the surround. Perceptual alternation in hue was found for the two physically identical chromaticities. Stereoscopic depth also was perceived, corroborating binocular neural combination despite color rivalry (Treisman, 1962). The results show that color rivalry is resolved after color-appearance shifts caused by chromatic context, and that color rivalry does not require competing unequal cone excitations from the rivalrous stimuli.

Keywords

Chromatic inductionColor rivalryNeural representation of color appearance
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , May 2008 , pp. 361 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, T.J. & Blakemore, C. (2002). Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 42, 301–309l.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, T.J. & Lotto, R.B. (2004). Fusion and rivalry are dependent on the perceptual meaning of visual stimuli. Current Biology 14, 418–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, R. & Logothetis, N.K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Review Neuroscience 3, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, R., Yu, K., Lokey, M. & Norman, H. (1998). Binocular rivalry and motion perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10, 46–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Weert, C.M.M. & Wade, N.J. (1988). Compound binocular rivalry. Vision Research 28, 1031–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haynes, J.D., Deichmann, R. & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438, 496–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, M. & Sagawa, K. (1979). Binocular color fusion limit. Journal of Optical Society America 69, 316–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S.-H. & Blake, R. (2002). V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 2, 618–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S.-H. & Blake, R. (2004). A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 44, 983–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennie, P. (2003). The physiology of color vision. In The Science of Color, ed. Shevell, S.K., pp. 217–246. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logothetis, N.K., Leopold, D.A. & Sheinberg, D.L. (1996). What is rivaling during binocular rivalry? Nature 380, 621–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logothetis, N.K. & Schall, J.D. (1989). Neural correlates of subjective visual perception. Science 245, 761–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, D.I.A. & Boynton, R.M. (1979). Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. Journal of the Optical Society of America 69, 1183–1186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monnier, P. & Shevell, S.K. (2003). Large shifts in color appearance from patterned chromatic backgrounds. Nature Neuroscience 6, 801–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monnier, P. & Shevell, S.K. (2004). Chromatic induction from S-cone pattern. Vision Research 44, 849–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paffen, C.L.E., Tadin, D., te Pas, S.F., Blake, R. & Verstraten, F.A.J. (2006). Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46, 599–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J. & Heeger, D.J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience 3, 1153–1159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodieck, R.W. & Dreher, B. (1979). Visual suppression from nondominant eye in the lateral geniculate neucleus: A comparison of cat and monkey. Experimental Brain Research 35, 465–477.Google Scholar
Schroeder, C.E., Tenke, C.E., Arezzo, J.C. & Vaughan, H.G. Jr. (1990). Binocularity in the lateral geniculate neucleus of the alert macaque. Brain Research 521, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheinberg, D.L. & Logothetis, N.K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 94, 3408–3413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shevell, S.K. (2003). Color appearance. In The Science of Color, ed. Shevell, S.K., pp. 149–190. Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevell, S.K. & Monnier, P. (2005). Color shifts from S-cone patterned backgrounds: contrast sensitivity and spatial frequency selectivity. Vision Research 45, 1147–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, F. & Engel, S.A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J.T. & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrstriate cortex. Neuron 21, 753–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treisman, A. (1962). Binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 14, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, H. & Adams, P.A. (1954). Binocular rivalry of achromatic colors. The American Journal of Psychology 67, 513–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate neucleus. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1595–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar