Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T14:53:54.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Misbinding of color to form in afterimages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2008

STEVEN K. SHEVELL*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
REBECCA ST.CLAIR
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
SANG WOOK HONG
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Steven K. Shevell, Visual Science Laboratories, The University of Chicago, 940 E 57thStreet, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: shevell@uchicago.edu

Abstract

Under dichoptic viewing conditions, rivalrous gratings that differ in both color and form can give the percept of the color from one eye in part of the form in the other eye. This study examined the afterimage following such misbinding of color to form. The first experiment established that afterimages of the misbound percept were seen. Two possible mechanisms for the misbound afterimage are (1) persisting retinal representations that are rivalrous and subsequently resolved to give misbinding, as during rivalrous viewing, and (2) a persisting response from a central neural representation of the misbound percept with the form from one eye and color from the other eye. The results support afterimage formation from a central representation of the misbound percept, not from resolution of rivalrous monocular representations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gilroy, L.A. & Blake, R. (2005). The interaction between binocular rivalry and negative afterimages. Current Biology 15, 17401744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollins, M. (1980). The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics 27, 550556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, S.W. & Shevell, S.K. (2006). Resolution of binocular rivalry: Perceptual misbinding of color. Visual Neuroscience 23, 561566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamitani, Y. & Shimojo, S. (2004). Global yet early processing of visual surfaces. In The Visual Neurosciences, ed. Chalupa, L. & Werner, J., 11291138. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Loomis, J.M. (1972). The photopigment bleaching hypothesis of complementary afterimages: A psychophysical test. Vision Research 12, 15871594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, D.I.A. & Boynton, R.M. (1979). Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. Journal of the Opical Society of America 69, 11831185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paffen, C.L.E., Tadin, D., te Pas, S.F., Blake, R. & Verstraten, F.A.J. (2006). Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 46, 599604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakitt, B. & Long, G.M. (1979). Cones determine subjective offset of a stimulus but rods determine total persistence. Vision Research 19, 14391441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimojo, S., Kamitani, Y. & Nishida, S. (2001). Afterimage of perceptually filled-in surface. Science 293, 16771680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuchiya, N. & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience 8, 10961101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Virsu, V. & Laurinen, P. (1977). Long-lasting afterimages caused by neural adaptation. Vision Research 17, 853860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, H.R. (1997). A neural model of foveal light adaptation and afterimage formation. Visual Neuroscience 14, 403423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed