Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:03:13.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Policies of screening for colorectal cancer in European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2008

Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea
Affiliation:
Osteba-Basque Office for HTA and Nursing University School Vitoria-Gasteiz
José Asua
Affiliation:
Osteba-Basque Office for HTA
Kepa Latorre
Affiliation:
Hospital Txagorritxu, Osakidetza-SVS

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the current status of population screening for colon/rectum cancer in Europe to compare the different strategies, the coverage, the existence of pilot experiences, regional coverages, and the risk factors considered in each strategy.

Methods: A comprehensive, systematic search was performed in the literature for documents addressing population screening for colon/rectum cancer in Europe. An ad hoc questionnaire was prepared including questions considered relevant. The questionnaire was reviewed by experts in the area. To identify key informants, colleague members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), participants in the EUnetHTA project, or representatives of the ministries of health of the different European countries were contacted. The information provided by key informants was checked with information directly obtained from the ministries of health, gray literature, and research documents.

Results: An 88 percent response rate was obtained. In countries for which no questionnaire data were collected, information was directly retrieved from the Web sites of the corresponding ministries. Four countries were found to perform population screenings: Austria, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. However, they used different strategies. Five countries had begun regional or local strategies: Denmark, Finland, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland, and two additional countries (the Netherlands and Norway) reported ongoing research studies intended to determine the best strategy to implement a population-based screening program. Differences were found in age range, procedure chosen, and follow-up period.

Conclusions: Even though the European Council recommended a wider implementation of population screening for colon/rectum cancer, our results suggest that this recommendation continues to be valid. The differences found in screening strategies (in terms of age range, procedures, risk factors considered, and follow-up periods) are not warranted by the results obtained in research studies or regional-national cancer registries.

Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Berrino, F, De Angelis, R, Sant, M et al. ; EUROCARE Working group. Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: Results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:773783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bouvier, AM, Dancourt, V, Faivre, J. The role of cancer registries in the surveillance, epidemiologic research and disease prevention. Bull Cancer. 2003;90:865871.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Castells, A, Marzo, M, Bellas, B et al. Guia clinica de prevencion del cancer colorrectal. Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;27:573634.Google Scholar
4. Castiglione, G, Zappa, M, Ciatto, S. Comments on: Recomendations on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the European Union. Advisory Comittee on Cancer Prevention. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:14731478.Google Scholar
5. Consejo de la Unión Europea. Recomendaciones sobre el cribado del cáncer en la Unión Europea. Preparado por el Comité Consultivo para la prevención del cáncer tras la conferencia sobre el cribado y detección precoz del cáncer. 1999. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/genetics/cancer_screening_es.pdf.Google Scholar
6. Ferlay, J, Autier, P, Boniol, M et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Ferrandez, A, Sainz, S. Detección precoz del cáncer de colon. Estrategias individuales y colectivas. Huntsman Cancer Institute. Salt Lake City. Utah. Rev Clin Esp. 2003;203:542544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hewitson, P, Glasziou, P, Irwig, L, Towler, B, Watson, E. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;1:CD001216. Review.Google Scholar
9. Jensen, OM, Storm, HH. Objetivos y usos de los registros de cáncer. In: Jensen, OM, Parkin, DM, MacLennan, R, Muir, CS, Skeet, RG, eds. Registros de Cáncer: Principios y Métodos. Lyon, Francia: IARC; 1995:723.Google Scholar
10. Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud. Plan Integral de Oncología de Andalucía 2002–2006. http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/salud/principal/documentos.asp?pagina=Plan_Integral_Oncologia.Google Scholar
11. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. La situación del cáncer en España. http://cne.isciii.es/htdocs/concer/cancer-msc.pdf.Google Scholar
12. National Cancer Institute. Cáncer de colon. Versión profesional de la Salud. Mayo 2007. http://www.cancer.gov/espanol/pdq/tratamiento/colon/healthprofessional/allpages/print.Google Scholar
13. Paz Valiñas, l, Atienza Merino, G. Evaluación de la eficacia y efectividad del cribado población al del cáncer colorrectal. Aplicabilidad en el sistema Nacional de Salud. Santiago de Compostela: servicio Galego de Saúde. Axencia de avaliación de tecnologías Sanitarias de Galicia, Avalia-t; 2002. Informe de Evaluación. INF 2003/02. http://avalia-t.sergas.es.Google Scholar
14. Rex, DK. American College of Gastroenterology action plan for colorectal cancer prevention. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:574577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Ruiz-Ramos, M, Escolar, A, Hermosín, T. Mortality from colorectal cancer in Andalucía: findings in favor of mass screening. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2005;97:104114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Sancho-Garnier, H, Signan, N, Ruiz de Campos, L. Detección temprana. En: Prevención del cáncer: Estrategias basadas en la evidencia. Ginebra, Suiza: UICC; 2006:221239.Google Scholar
17. Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. The National Centre for Screening Monitoring Fourth Report. Rivista dell'Associazione italiana di epidemiologia ANNO 30 (1) GENNAIO-FEBBRAIO 2006 SUPPLEMENTO 3. http://www.osservatorionazionalescreening.it/eng/programmes/4th_rep/introduction.pdf.Google Scholar
19. Viñes, JJ, Ardanaz, E, Arrazola, A, Gaminde, I. Epidemiología poblacional del cáncer colorrectal: Revisión de la causalidad. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2003;26:7997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 1996: Fighting disease, fostering development. World Health Organization, Geneva; 1996.Google Scholar
21. WHO. Strategies to improve and strengthen cancer control programmes in Europe. Report of a EHO consultation. Geneva: WHO; 2003.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gutierrez supplementary material

Gutierrez supplementary material

Download Gutierrez supplementary material(File)
File 66 KB