Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:11:40.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WHERE IS KARL BARTH IN MODERN EUROPEAN HISTORY?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

RUDY KOSHAR
RUDY KOSHAR*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Anglophone historians of modern Europe know Karl Barth primarily as the intellectual leader of the anti-Nazi Church Struggle and the principle author of the Barmen Declaration of 1934, which spoke a dramatic “No” to National Socialism's attack on the German churches. But Barth was also arguably the most important—and most prolific—theologian of the twentieth century. Aside from his unfinished magnum opus, the fourteen-volume Church Dogmatics, he published more than one hundred books and articles, and he quite literally wrote until the day he died in 1968. Barth's output has elicited an equally impressive secondary literature, produced mostly by students of theology and amounting to around fourteen thousand titles in twenty-five languages. As might be expected, theologians differ in their interpretations of Barth, seeing him as a formative voice in “neo-orthodox” Protestantism, a left-wing socialist, a fitting subject of deconstructionist philosophical theology, a thinker who showed the way “past the modern,” or a “critically realistic dialectical theologian.” In view of this record it may come as a surprise to find that until recently the Swiss was still “habitually honored but not much read,” as theologian George Hunsinger wrote in 1991. Hunsinger was not the only observer to see that Barth's work was never fully integrated into the corpus of theological culture in Europe and the United States despite the scholarly interest in his thought. This situation may be changing, as a transatlantic “Barth renaissance” now gathers momentum, nearly forty years after the great theologian's death.

Type
Essays
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 333 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Busch, Eberhard, Karl Barth: His Life from Letters and Autobiographical Texts (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1975), 497–9Google Scholar.

2 Drewes, Hans-Anton, “Theologie im Umbruch: Ein Heidelberger Symposium zu Karl Barth,” Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 11 Nov. 2005Google Scholar. Thanks to Ulrich Rosenhagen for making this source available to me.

3 Roberts, Richard H., “The Reception of Karl Barth in the Anglo-Saxon World: History, Typology and Prospect,” in Sykes, S. W., ed., Karl Barth: Centenary Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 140–41Google Scholar.

4 Marquardt, Friedrich-Wilhelm, Theologie und Sozialismus: Das Beispiel Karl Barths (Munich: Kaiser, 1972)Google Scholar.

5 Ward, Graham, Barth, Derrida and the Language of Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

6 Trowitzsch, Michael, Über die Moderne hinaus. Theologie im Übergang (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999)Google Scholar.

7 McCormack, Bruce L., Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: Its Genesis and Development, 1909–1936 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995)Google Scholar.

8 Hunsinger, George, How to Read Karl Barth: The Shape of His Theology (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 27Google Scholar; Webster, John, Barth, 2nd edn (London: Continuum, 2004), 1Google Scholar; Barth, Karl, How I Changed My Mind (Richmond, VA: John Knox Press, 1966), 43Google Scholar; Beintker, Michael, Link, Christian, and Trowitzsch, Michael, eds., Karl Barth in Deutschland (1921–1935): Aufbruch–Klärung–Widerstand (Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, 2005)Google Scholar; McCormack, Bruce L., “The Barth Renaissance in America: An Opinion,” Princeton Seminary Bulletin 23/3 (2002), 337–40Google Scholar.

9 Webster, Barth, 1. I leave aside the more specialized subfield of the history of theology; see Bruce L. McCormack, “Die theologiegeschichtliche Ort Karl Barths,” in Beintker, Link, and Trowitzsch, Karl Barth in Deutschland, 15–40.

10 Rendtorff, Trutz, “The Modern Age as a Chapter in the History of Christianity: Or, The Legacy of Historical Consciousness in Present Theology,” Journal of Religion 65/4 (Oct. 1985), 478–99, 498CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Ericksen, Robert P. and Heschel, Susannah, eds., Betrayal: German Churches and the Holocaust (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

12 Shelley Baranowski, “The Confessing Church and Antisemitism: Protestant Identity, German Nationhood, and the Exclusion of the Jews,” in Ericksen and Heschel, Betrayal, 103. Hockenos's, Matthew D.A Church Divided: German Protestants Confront the Nazi Past (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2004)Google Scholar makes frequent mention of Barth in the post-World War II period, but of course its thematic focus connects directly to the history of the Church Struggle, and it is not as such a study of Barth.

13 Gregory, Brad S., “The Other Confessional History: On Secular Bias in the Study of Religion,” History and Theory, Theme Issue, 45 (Dec. 2006), 132–49, 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar; original emphasis.

14 Consider Peukert's, Detlev J. K.The Weimar Republic: The Crisis of Classical Modernity (New York: Hill and Wang, 1989)Google Scholar, still influential nearly two decades after its appearance in English, which is, however, silent on the theological ferment of the 1920s.

15 Pelikan, Jaroslav, The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine, vol. 5: Christian Doctrine and Modern Culture since 1700 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Lepenies, Wolf, The Seduction of Culture in German History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006), 39Google Scholar.

17 Ingolf U. Dalferth, “Karl Barth's Eschatological Realism,” in Sykes, Karl Barth: Centenary Essays, 14–45.

18 Geyer, Michael and Hölscher, Lucian, “Einleitung,” in Geyer, Michael and Hölscher, Lucian, eds., Die Gegenwart Gottes in der modernen Gesellschaft: Transzendenz und religiöse Vergemeinschaftung in Deutschland (Göttingen: Wallstein, 2006), 9Google Scholar.

19 McLeod, Hugh, ed., The Cambridge History of Christianity, vol. 9: World Christianities c.1914–c.2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Rabinbach, Anson, In the Shadow of Catastrophe: German Intellectuals between Apocalypse and Enlightenment (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Gordon, Peter Eli, Rosenzweig and Heidegger: Between Judaism and German Philosophy (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Moyn, Samuel, Origins of the Other: Emmanuel Levinas between Revelation and Ethics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; idem, “From Experience to Law: Leo Strauß and the Weimar Crisis of the Philosophy of Religion,” History of European Ideas 33/2 (June 2007), 174–94; Lilla, Mark, The Stillborn God: Religion, Politics, and the Modern West (New York: Knopf, 2007)Google Scholar. Thanks to Mark Lilla for generously sharing chapter drafts with me before the publication of his book.

21 Howard, Thomas Albert, Protestant Theology and the Making of the Modern German University (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm, “Kulturprotestantismus: Zur Begriffsgeschichte einer theologiepolitischen Chiffre,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 28 (1984), 214–68Google Scholar.

22 Sheehan, Jonathan, The Enlightenment Bible: Translation, Scholarship, Culture (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

23 Moses, John A., “Bonhoeffer's Germany: The Political Context,” in Gruchy, John W. de, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Dietrich Bonhoeffer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 7–8Google Scholar.

24 Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm, ed., Ernst Troeltschs ‘Historismus’ (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2000)Google Scholar; Chapman, Mark D., Ernst Troeltsch and Liberal Theology: Religion and Cultural Synthesis in Wilhelmine Germany (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Liebersohn, Harry, Fate and Utopia in German Sociology, 1870–1923 (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1988), 40–77Google Scholar; Iggers, George G., The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of Historical Thought from Herder to the Present (Middletown, CT: Weseleyan University Press, 1983), 177–95Google Scholar.

25 Chadwick, Owen, The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), 17Google Scholar.

26 Stanley, Brian, “The Outlook for Christianity in 1914,” in Gilley, Sheridan and Stanley, Brian, eds., Cambridge History of Christianity, vol. 8: World Christianities c.1815–c.1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 593–600Google Scholar.

27 Harnack, Adolf von, What Is Christianity? (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1986)Google Scholar, based on lectures given 1899–1900.

28 Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), 520Google Scholar.

29 McCormack, Karl Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology, 78–125.

30 Cremer, Douglas J., “Protestant Theology in Early Weimar Germany: Barth, Tillich, and Bultmann,” Journal of the History of Ideas 56/2 (April 1995), 289–307, 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Rupp, George, Culture-Protestantism: German Liberal Theology at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1977), 11Google Scholar.

32 Barth, Karl, The Epistle to the Romans (London: Oxford University Press, 1933)Google Scholar, the English translation of the revised German edition, cited below as Romans II. The first German edition is Der Römerbrief (Berne: G. A. Bäschlin, 1919).

33 Irit Rogoff, “Modern German Art,” in Eva Kolinsky and Wilfried van der Will, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Modern German Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 264.

34 Cited in Busch, Karl Barth, 98; see also Barth to Eduard Thurneysen, 27 Sept. 1917, in Karl Barth–Eduard Thurneysen: Ein Briefswechsel aus der Frühzeit der dialektischen Theologie (Munich: Siebenstern, 1966), 47.

35 Marchand, Suzanne, “German Orientalism and the Decline of the West,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145/4 (Dec. 2001), 465–73Google Scholar.

36 Moyn, Origins of the Other, esp. chap. 4; Myers, David N., Resisting History: Historicism and Its Discontents in German-Jewish Thought (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

37 Ogletree, Thomas W., Christian Faith and History: A Critical Comparison of Ernst Troeltsch and Karl Barth (Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2003), 112–14Google Scholar.

38 Barth, “Preface to First Edition,” Romans II, 1.

39 Overbeck, Franz, On the Christianity of Theology (San Jose, CA: Pickwick Publications, 2002), 89Google Scholar.

40 Breckman, Warren, Marx, the Young Hegelians, and the Origins of Radical Social Theory: Dethroning the Self (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Löwith, Karl, From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964)Google Scholar.

41 Barth, Karl, Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2002), 1–15Google Scholar.

42 Barth, Karl, The Humanity of God (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1960)Google Scholar.

43 Busch, Karl Barth, 169.

44 Cornelis van der Kooi, “Karl Barths Zweither Römerbrief und seine Wirkungen,” in Beintker, Link, and Trowitzsch, Karl Barth in Deutschland, 57–75, 64–5.

45 Gorringe, Timothy J., Karl Barth: Against Hegemony (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 108–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Barth, Die Kirchliche Dogmatik II/2 (Zürich: Evangelischer Verlag Zollikon, 1942), 11–12.

47 Barth, Church Dogmatics III/2 (London: T. & T. Clark, 2004), 157, 439. On the metaphor of veiling and unveiling, see McCormack, Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology, 366–7. The much-discussed question of the historicity of Christ cannot be addressed here. For a critical appraisal of Barth in German Christological thought see McGrath, Alister E., The Making of Modern German Christology, 1750–1990, 2nd edn (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1994), 123–43Google Scholar.

48 Koselleck, Reinhart, “Crisis,” Journal of the History of Ideas 67/2 (April, 2006), 357–400, 398–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Barth, Karl, Dogmatics in Outline (New York: Harper, 1959), 154Google Scholar.

50 Ogletree, Christian Faith and History, 185–91.

51 Crowe, Benjamin D., Heidegger's Religious Origins: Destruction and Authenticity (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

52 Iggers, German Conception of History, 195.

53 Hunsinger, How to Read Karl Barth, 43–9.

54 By contrast, Harvey, Van A., The Historian and Believer: The Morality of Historical Knowledge and Christian Belief (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1996; first published 1966), 153–9Google Scholar, sees inconsistency in Barth's reading of “faith and fact.”

55 Rudolf, Marburg theologianfamous, Otto's stillThe Idea of the Holy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958)Google Scholar, first published in 1917, received a qualified but positive response in Barth to Thurneysen, 3 June 1919, in Karl Barth–Eduard Thurneysen, 50.

56 McCormack, Barth's Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology, 464–7.

57 Ibid., 422; Michael Beintker, “. . . Alles andere als ein Parergon: Fides quaerens intellectum,” in Beintker, Link, and Trowitzsch, Karl Barth in Deutschland, 99–120, where the author argues that the transition from Barth's early work to his Church Dogmatics cannot be located in a sudden turn represented by the Anselm study.

58 Rasmussen, Larry L., Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Reality and Resistance (Louisville and London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Moyn, Origins of the Other; Haynes, Stephen R., The Bonhoeffer Phenomenon: Portraits of a Protestant Saint (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

59 Biggar, Nigel, The Hastening that Waits: Karl Barth's Ethics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Kirchliche Dogmatik II/2, 11.

61 Balthasar, Hans Urs von, The Theology of Karl Barth (San Francisco: Communio Books, 1992), 47–55Google Scholar.

62 Biggar, The Hastening that Waits, 155.

63 Nowak, Kurt, Geschichte des Christentums in Deutschland: Religion, Politik und Gesellschaft vom Ende der Aufklärung bis zur Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1995), 205–42Google Scholar.

64 Palma, Robert J., Karl Barth's Theology of Culture: The Freedom of Culture for the Praise of God (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 1983)Google Scholar; Lazier, Benjamin, “Overcoming Gnosticism: Hans Jonas, Hans Blumenberg, and the Legitimacy of the Natural World,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64/4 (Oct. 2003), 619–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stroup, John, “Political Theology and Secularization Theory in Germany, 1918–39,” Harvard Theological Review 80/3 (July 1987), 321–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 See Robinson, James M., ed., The Beginnings of Dialectical Theology, vol. 1 (Richmond, VA: John Knox Press, 1968), 165–6Google Scholar.

66 Ibid., 167; original emphasis.

67 Ibid., 168; original emphasis.

68 Ibid., 170.

69 Ibid., 277, 279. Gogarten's piece appeared as “Zwischen die Zeiten,” Die Christliche Welt 34 (1920), 374–8. On Gogarten as “dreadnought” see Barth to Thurneysen, 27 Oct. 1920, in Karl Barth–Eduard Thurneysen, 56.

70 Kracauer, Siegfried, “Those Who Wait,” in Levin, Thomas Y., ed., The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), 129Google Scholar.

71 Löwith, Karl, My Life in Germany before and after 1933 (Urbana, IL and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1994), 26Google Scholar. Löwith was no exception; see Van der Kooi, “Karl Barths zweiter Römerbrief und seine Wirkungen.”

72 Barth, Church Dogmatics III/2, 3.

73 Ibid., 10.

74 Ibid., 11.

75 McCormack, 31–5.

76 Balthasar, Theology of Karl Barth, 83.

77 Webb, Stephen H., Re-figuring Theology: The Rhetoric of Karl Barth (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

78 Gorringe, Against Hegemony, 73–84.

79 Von Balthasar, Theology of Karl Barth, 36.

80 Barth, Church Dogmatics III/2, 112, 113.

81 Ibid., 115.

82 Ibid., 119.

83 The debate is reprinted as Emil Brunner and Barth, Karl, Natural Theology (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2002)Google Scholar.

84 Church Dogmatics III/2, 447.

85 Gorringe, Against Hegemony, 174.

86 Benjamin, Walter, “Theses on the Philosophy of History” (written in 1940), in Arendt, Hannah, ed., Illuminations: Essays and Reflections (New York: Schocken Books, 1969), 256Google Scholar; Barth, Romans II, 258. Benjamin was unaware of Barth's work; see Jay, Martin, Songs of Experience: Modern American and European Variations on a Universal Theme (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005), 316Google Scholar.

87 Assmann, Jan, Politische Theologie zwischen Ägypten und Israel, 3rd edn (Munich: Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung, 2006), 23–35Google Scholar.

88 Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Roman Catholicism and Political Form (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1996). For recent scholarship on Schmitt see Meier, Heinrich, The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction between Political Theology and Political Philosophy (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998)Google Scholar; idem, Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: The Hidden Dialogue (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1995); McCormick, John P., “Political Theory and Political Theology: The Second Wave of Carl Schmitt in English, Political Theory 26/6 (Dec. 1998), 830–54Google Scholar.

89 On recent uses of Barthian political theology see Gorringe, Against Hegemony; Haddon Willmer, “Karl Barth,” in Peter Scott and Cavanaugh, William T., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Political Theology (Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), 123–35Google Scholar; on Schmitt's awareness of Barth see Braun, Dietrich, “Carl Schmitt and Friedrich Gogarten,” in Wacker, Bernd, ed., Die eigentlich katholischer Verschärfung . . . Konfession, Theologie und Politik im Werk Carl Schmitts (Munich: Fink, 1994), 203–27, 223, 225Google Scholar.

90 Germino, Dante L., “Two Types of Recent Christian Political Thought,” Journal of Politics 21/3 (Aug. 1959), 455–86Google Scholar; West, Charles C., Communism and the Theologians: Study of an Encounter (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1958)Google Scholar. But see now Hockenos, Matthew, “The German Protestant Debate on Politics and Theology after the Second World War,” in Dianne Kirby, ed., Religion and the Cold War (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)Google Scholar.

91 Haddorff, David, “Karl Barth's Theological Politics,” introduction to Karl Barth, Community, State, and Church: Three Essays (Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2004), 3Google Scholar.

92 Cremer, “Protestant Theology,” 290; Barth to Thurneysen, 11 Nov. 1918, in Karl Barth–Eduard Thurneysen, 48–9.

93 Barth, Romans II, 220.

94 See Cremer, “Protestant Theology,” 290.

95 Barth, Romans II, 220.

96 Busch, Karl Barth, 111.

97 Korsch, Dietrich, Dialektische Theologie nach Karl Barth (Tübingen: Mohr, 1996), 36Google Scholar.

98 Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1976)Google Scholar.

99 Willmer, “Barth,” 124.

100 Gorringe, Against Hegemony, 77; Busch, Karl Barth, 209, 218.

101 Willmer, “Barth,” 124.

102 Barth, Karl, Theologische Existenz heute! (Geneva: World Council of Churches, 1933), 3Google Scholar.

103 Conway, John S., The Nazi Persecution of the Churches, 1933–1945 (New York: Basic Books, 1968), 10–11Google Scholar.

104 Bergen, Doris L., Twisted Cross: The German Christian Movement in the Third Reich (Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

105 But there is also a recent affirmative scholarship: Lindsay, Mark R., Covenanted Solidarity: The Theological Basis of Karl Barth's Opposition to Nazi Antisemitism and the Holocaust (New York: Peter Lang, 2001)Google Scholar.

106 Hockenos, A Church Divided, 173.

107 See Kirchliche Dogmatik, II/2, the entirety of chap. 7, over five hundred pages long, where this point is made repeatedly.

108 West, Communism and the Theologians, 312–18; Karl Barth, Against the Stream: Shorter Post-war Writings, 1946–52 (New York: Philosophical Library, 1954), 92.

109 Nowak, Geschichte des Christentums, 315.

110 See, above all, Barth, Karl, “The Christian Community and the Civil Community,” in idem, Community, State, and Church, 149–89Google Scholar.

111 See Bell, Daniel M. Jr., “State and Civil Society,” in Scott and Cavanaugh, Blackwell Companion to Political Theology, 423–38Google Scholar.

112 Howard, Thomas Albert, Religion and the Rise of Historicism: W. M. L. Wetter, Jacob Burckhardt, and the Theological Origins of Nineteenth-Century Historical Consciousness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Moyn, Samuel, “Amos Funkenstein on the Theological Origins of Historicism,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64/4 (Oct. 2003), 639–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

113 Marchand, Suzanne and Lindenfeld, David, “Germany at the Fin-de-Siècle: An Introduction,” in Marchand, Suzanne and Lindenfeld, David, eds., Germany at the Fin-de-Siècle: Culture, Politics, and Ideas (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 2004), 30Google Scholar.

114 Sheehan, Enlightenment Bible, ix.

115 Two examples: Lilla, Mark, The Reckless Mind: Intellectuals and Politics (New York: New York Review Books, 2001)Google Scholar; Wolin, Richard, The Seduction of Unreason: The Intellectual Romance with Fascism from Nietzsche to Postmodernism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

116 Gentile, Emilio, Politics as Religion (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar.

117 For a recent attempt to relate Barth to Habermas see Stanley, Timothy, “From Habermas to Barth and back again,” Journal of Church and State 48/1 (Winter 2006), 101–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar.