Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:02:38.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's in a name? Coming to terms with the child's linguistic environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2008

MATTHEW SAXTON
MATTHEW SAXTON*
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Matthew Saxton, Department of Psychology and Human Development, Institute of Education, University of London, 25 Woburn Square, London, WC1H 0AA, UK. fax: +44 (0)20-7612-6304; e-mail: M.Saxton@ioe.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews the proliferation of terms that have been coined to denote the language environment of the young child. It is argued that terms are often deployed by researchers without due consideration of their appropriateness for particular empirical studies. It is further suggested that just three of the dozen or more available terms meet the needs of child language researchers in most instances: child-directed speech, infant-directed speech and exposurelanguage. The phenomena denoted by these terms are then considered. The term register is generally borrowed for this purpose from sociolinguistics. However, close inspection of this concept reveals that the notion of register needs to be constrained, in specified ways, in order to be of any real value within the field of child language research.

Type
Brief Research Report
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 677 - 686
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am very grateful to the following for information, suggestions and comments, offered via the Info-CHILDES discussion forum (http://groups.google.com/group/info-childes). Ruth Berman, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, John Bohannon, John Bonvillian, Robin Campbell, Leila Gleitman, Keith Nelson, Anat Ninio, Barbara Zurer Pearson, Brian Richards, Dan Slobin, Catherine Snow, Carol Stoel-Gammon, Edy Veneziano, Marilyn Vihman and Fay Wouk. I also thank Dick Hudson for helpful comments.

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. R. & Pempek, T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist 48(5), 505–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: a cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannon, J. N. & Marquis, A. L. (1977). Children's control of adult speech. Child Development 48, 1002–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (2003). First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, E. B. & St. Clair-Stokes, J. (1984). Caregiver-child interactive behaviours – a videotape analysis procedure. Volta Review 86(4), 200–16.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. P. & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development 61(5), 1584–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. (1989). Intonation and communicative intent in mothers' speech to infants: is the melody the message? Child Development 60, 1497–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gergely, G., Egyed, K. & Kiraly, I. (2007). On pedagogy. Developmental Science 10(1), 139–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition 73(2), 135–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, J. (2001). An introduction to sociolinguistics, 2nd ed.Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. A. (1980). Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, S. & Horie, P. I. (2000). Creating speech register in Thai conversation. Language in Society 29(4), 519–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941/1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lukens, H. T. (1894). Preliminary report on the learning of language. Pedagogical Seminary 3, 424–60.Google Scholar
Mannle, S. & Tomasello, M. (1987). Fathers, siblings, and the bridge hypothesis. In Nelson, K. E. & Kleeck, A. van (eds), Children's language, Vol. VI, 23–42. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. & Davis, B. L. (2004). Baby talk and the emergence of first words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(4), 517–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Denninger, M. M., Bonvillian, J. D., Kaplan, B. J. & Baker, N. (1984). Maternal input adjustments and non-adjustments as related to children's linguistic advances and to language acquisition theories. In Pellegrini, A. D. & Yawkey, T. D. (eds), The development of oral and written language in social contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L. (1975). Motherese: the speech of mothers to young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ninio, A. (1986). The direct mapping of function to form in children's early language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 15, 559 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1982). Ergativity and word order in Samoan child language. Language 58(3), 646–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, C. F., Pine, J. M., Lieven, E. V. M. & Theakston, A. L. (2003). Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language 30(3), 609–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, C. (1993). Sociosituational variation. In Sanders, C. (ed.), French today: language in its social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, F. F., Fosha, D., Stemp, S., Brotman, N. & Ganger, S. (1976). Everyday caretaker talk to toddlers vs. 3s and 4s. Journal of Child Language 3(2), 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1977). Role of cognitive development and linguistic input in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 4(2), 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokol, R. I., Webster, K. L., Thompson, N. S. & Stevens, D. A. (2005). Whining as mother-directed speech. Infant and Child and Development 14(5), 478–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solano-Flores, G. (2006). Language, dialect, and register: sociolinguistics and the estimation of measurement error in the testing of English language learners. Teachers College Record 108(11), 2354–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardif, T., Shatz, M. & Naigles, L. (1997). Caregiver speech and children's use of nouns versus verbs: a comparison of English, Italian, and Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 24(3), 535–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren-Leubecker, A. & Bohannon, J. N. (1984). Intonation patterns in child-directed speech – mother-father differences. Child Development 55(4), 1379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar