Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-17T13:44:14.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Embodiment, Materiality, and Power. A Review Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Peter van der Veer
Affiliation:
Utrecht University

Extract

Theories of agency are central to any form of explanation or interpretation of human action in the social and behavioral sciences, including the study of history. In studies of religion, they appear to require even more reflection than usual, because of secular skepticism of religious understandings of agency, involving divine intervention or supra-human powers. The major problem with theories of agency is their immense range and complexity. They involve fundamental notions of emotions and intentions, of habits and social practice, of desire and passion, of passions and interests, of resistance and power, of freedom and un-freedom, of the distinction between subject and object, of interiority and exteriority. As such, they have complicated genealogies in different religious and philosophical traditions. Western philosophical traditions are among the many traditions that have wide-ranging theories about the self and agency and express them in a universalistic language.1 These universalistic claims are perhaps common, but the history of European expansion has implied a universalization of Western thought, so that despite its provincial origin Western thought informs both the understanding and the self-understanding of other societies. From the start, one of the tasks of anthropology and history has therefore been to critique universalistic assumptions about, for instance, agency, by examining other ways of life and traditions. Not only is universalism as such being questioned; the universalization of ideas is being critically analyzed.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Comparative Studies in Society and History 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Taylor, Charles, Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

2 Asad, Talal, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2003), 67100.Google Scholar

3 Eickelman, Dale, “Mass Higher Education and the Religious Imagination in Contemporary Arab Societies,” American Ethnologist 19, 4 (1992): 643–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Asad, Talal, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993), ch. 1.Google Scholar

5 Hervieu-Leger, Daniele, Religion as a Chain of Memory (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

6 Needham, Rodney, Belief, Language, and Experience (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972).Google Scholar

7 Schipper, Kristofer, The Taoist Body (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar

8 Fuller, C. J., The Renewal of the Priesthood: Modernity and Traditionalism in a South Indian Temple (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar